News Update

Indian Port Bill 2021 will enable optimal management of coastline: MoSJ&K politicos meet PM; say Modi Govt is keen to restore statehoodIndia successfully test-fires 1000 km subsonic cruise N-capable missileI-T raids in Raipur unearth Rs 6 Crores illicit cashWorld Bank lends USD 32 Mn for bolstering healthcare in MizoramApple HomePod merits classification under SH 8517 6290 of the CTA, 1975: AARIncome tax raids 4 premises of hawala operator in Raipur; Cash worth Rs 6 crore seizedMukesh Ambani says Jio to use Google Cloud for 5G services + Rs 75K Crore investment in clean energyGST - Rule 108(3) of Rules, 2017 - Requirement of submission of certified copy of order appealed within one week - Interests of justice ought not to be constrained by a hyper-technical view - Appellate authority to adopt a liberal approach: HCGST - Section 107(4) of CGST Act, 2017 does not preclude the appellate authority from condoning a delay of a longer period: HCBrazilian SC admits lower court judge was biased against ex-President LulaST - Non-cooperation and absence of truthfulness - Settlement of disputes can never be claimed as a matter of right - CCESC was not in error in sending matter back to the adjudicating authority: HCBRICS nations to hold R&D conclaves on healthcare, energy solutionsCOVID-19 - Lab-leak theory - Missing 'smoking gun' puts House of virologists on 'fire'!India attracted USD 6.24 bn FDI inflows in April monthCus - Service by indirect methods, such as publication and affixture must be only after service by direct means set out in s.153 have been attempted and established to have failed – no proof of having served SCN – principles of natural justice violated: HCPMI peaks to 59.2 for June month for EUI-T - Co-operative banks are primarily co-operative societies & so any interest/dividend earned from such co-operative banks would be eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) : ITATTax Inspectors Without Borders Program launched in Bhutan; India partnersI-T - Disallowance of delayed deposit of contribution received by the employees' towards PF & ESI is not tenable where such contribution is made before due date of filing ITR: ITATI-T - Unless assessee offered income for taxation, TDS cannot be given credit: ITATI-T - Interest on unutilised grant has to be treated as part of grant itself and cannot be subjected to tax: ITATI-T - Simply because progress billing was more than stage of percentage of completion, the same in itself, is no basis to usurp consistent method of accounting followed by taxpayer: ITATBombay HC gets 4 Addl Judges & one for Kerala for two yearsGovt sets up 3-member task force on bureaucratic reforms - Mission Karmayogi; Former Infosys CEO Shibu Lal given taks with Govind Iyer and Pankaj Bansal of PeopleStrongGovt notifies Draft Cantonment Land Administration Rules for better management of land poolCOVID-19 - India reports 54K cases with marginally less than 1000 deaths in 24 hours + US, UK register rise in Delta variant cases + Global daily death count once again goes above 8000Anti-virus Software titan John McAfee commits suicide in jail after Spanish HC okays extradition to US on tax evasion charges involving cryptocurrency fraud caseUS embargoes import of solar products from Xinjiang province in China
 
Invoke Cooperative Federalism to Check Tax Uncertainty

DECEMBER 02, 2016

By TIOL Edit Team

INDIA'S growing tax revenue uncertainty is cause for deep worry for three major reasons – 1) Demonetization 2) Its dark shadow over introduction of long-delayed Goods and Service Tax (GST) on 1st April 2017 & 3) Adverse impact of Centre's unilateral macro-economic decisions on State finances.

Amidst the growing Tsunami of reduced GDP estimates worked by different entities post demonetization, one conclusion is unmistakable: Both Central and State tax revenues would get dented due to cash shortage-driven slump in demand & economic activities.

The spurt in payment of pending tax dues such as property tax with demonetized Rs. 500 & 1000 notes created irrational exuberance among demonetization votaries. This trend would peter out by December-end.

As it is, decline in VAT receipts in certain States has rattled revenue authorities. Telangana has tentatively projected demonetization-triggered reduction in its tax receipts at Rs. 3,000 crore for the balance period of 2016-17. It is monitoring tax collections on daily basis.

Kerala says it is struggling to fund its expenditure on various activities. It has reportedly suffered revenue loss of more than Rs. 2,000 crore, which is expected to increase in the next four months.

Uttarakhand has formed a high-level committee to study impact of demonetization on its tax receipts. Its Chief Minister Harish Rawat has already written a letter to Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, seeking help to tide over the impact of demonentisation on tourism, agriculture and overall tax receipts.

Mr. Rawat reportedly wrote: "Demonetisation is weighing heavy on a state already battling the losses caused by the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission."

Karnataka too has raised concern over tax revenue uncertainty. The final stamp on States' concern on this count has been emphatically delivered by Amit Mitra, West Bengal Finance Minister and Chairman of Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers.

In an interview to a TV channel, he reportedly stated that post-demonetization, GST has become a "double whammy" for states. Mr. Mitra said he would consult his counterparts in other States to reconsider GST roll-out timing.

Mr. Mitra pointed out that states are losing more money post demonetization, which is expected to reduce GDP growth by 2%. Noting that all leading economist have disapproved demonetization, he said: "The government needs to redo its arithmetic."

Yes, every stakeholder in the economy right from daily wage earner to mighty MNCs and all-mighty Union Government are already assessing the impact of demonetization.

The Union Government ought to be more transparent and pragmatic in taking into confidence not only States but the entire nation on its strategy to minimize the impact on economy.

The Union Finance Ministry should get into damage-control mode. And the first step it should take in this regard is to set up a joint Committee of Centre and States to assess all revenue losses. The Committee should recommend measures to cushion the impact of demonetization on different sectors, central and State schemes and the public.

The Committee should also suggest the quantum of Central compensation for revenue loss suffered by each State Government. It should also work out revised date for GST roll-out. The Centre must realize that introduction of GST in economy disrupted by severe cash crunch is fraught with grave risks.

The Centre should realize that it has already pushed weaker States to the brink of financial crisis by unilaterally implementing award of Pay Commission, whose formation has been repeatedly opposed by Finance Commission.

Ideally, the Centre should provide grants or soft loans to the States to enable them to implement wage hike for their respective staff keeping in view Pay Commission award as they have done in the past.

It is here pertinent to recollect that NDA-I/Vajpayee Government constituted in 2002 a committee under the Chairmanship of Union Finance Minister to assess the impact of pay revision on States' finances and make suitable recommendations. It took this step "in the spirit of cooperative federalism," as it stated in Parliament at that time.

The sooner the Centre constitutes a Committee to study the impact of demonetization and Pay Commission award on States, the better it is for tax certainty including minimizing delay in launch of GST. Reduction of tax uncertainty in particular and economic uncertainty in general would also improve investment climate.

It is high time the union ministers confine political rhetoric over benefits of demonetization to electoral arena and concentrate on minimizing its negative effects on the economy.

As put by National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP), "The demonetisation undertaken by the government is a large shock to the economy. The impact of the shock in the medium term is a function of how much of the currency will be replaced at the end of the replacement process and the extent to which currency in circulation is extinguished."

In a Working Paper captioned 'Demonetisation: Impact on the Economy' issued on 14th November, NIPFP concludes: "While it has been argued that the cash that would be extinguished would be 'black money' and hence, should be rightfully extinguished to set right the perverse incentive structure in the economy, this argument is based on impressions rather than on facts. While the facts are not available to anybody, it would be foolhardy to argue that this is the only possibility."


POST YOUR COMMENTS