News Update

After US & UK India comes third in terms of 79 mn cyber attacks in 2023: StudyCore Sector loses steam in March; logs 5.2% growthTrump fined USD 9,000 for ignoring court’s gag orderNHPC to collaborate with Norwegian company for Floating Solar Energy TechnologyCT - Option of review cannot be utilised as a method of rehearing or appeal and there must be finality to a litigation: HCST - As agreement with foreign supplier was on C.I.F basis and it was foreign supplier who entered into an agreement with foreign shipping line for transportation of goods, hence appellant not being a service recipient was not liable to pay service tax on amount of ocean freight: CESTATOpenAI joins hands with FT to access content for training AI toolsCX - Entire chain, right from procurement of aluminium ingots from NALCO upto delivery of aluminium conductors, transaction was established and accepted by Settlement Commission, no scope for Adjudicating Authority to confirm demand of Cenvat credit: CESTATIndia’s oil import bill likely to come down to USD 100 bn in current fiscalCus - Warehousing - None of the provisions have been contravened or violated by appellants inasmuch as in respect of all B/Es, the activities were carried out with approval and necessary permission given by department as well as under supervision of Customs - goods not liable for confiscation/penalty: CESTAT7 Maoists including two women killed in police encounter in ChhattisgarhBaba Ramdev-promoted FMCG companies caught in a pickle over GST fraudsI-T- As per settled position in law, if let out property remains vacant during whole of relevant AY, then its ALV is to be taken as NIL: ITATUttarakhand Govt cancels manufacturing licence of 14 products of PatanjaliIMF okays USD 1.1 bn bail-out package for Pakistan3 police officers killed in shoot-out in CarolinaGaza protesters on Columbia Univ campus turn tin-eared to police warningsBus swings into gorge; 25 Peruvians killedI-T - Sale consideration received in cash in lieu of agreement of sale upon failure of deal, cannot be penalized u/s 271D: ITATBattle against cocaine cartel: 9 Colombian soldiers perish in copter crashI-T- Payment made by NSE to Core SGF is business expenditure allowed u/s 37(1): ITATICG, ATS Gujarat seize Indian fishing boat carrying 173 kg of narcotics9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in Chhattisgarh
 
IDS 2016 - Two mega declarations worth Rs 2 lakh crore & Rs 13860 Cr found false - Probe begins to discover intent behind such declarations

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, DEC 04, 2016: THE Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 which was announced in the Budget 2016, came to an end on September 30. Declarations totalling Rs. 65,250 crore were received from 64,275 declarants, subject to reconciliation. After final reconciliation the revised figure of actual declarations received and taken on record was Rs. 67,382 crore which had been made by 71,726 declarants.

Among the declarations received, there were two sets of declarations of high value which were not taken on record in the above figure because they were found to be suspicious in nature being filed by persons of small means. A family of four declarants namely, Mr. Abdul Razzaque Mohammed Sayed (self), Mr.Mohammed Aarif Abdul Razzaque Sayed (son), Shrimati Rukhsana Abdul Razzaque Sayed (wife) and Ms. Noorjahan Mohammed Sayed (sister) who were shown as residents of Flat no. 4 , Ground Floor , Jubilee Court, 269-B, T.P.S-III, Linking Road, Bandra (W), Mumbai, filed a total declaration of Rs. Two lakh crore. Three out of the four PAN numbers were originally in Ajmer which were migrated to Mumbai in September 2016, where the declarations were filed. The other declaration was filed by one Mr. Maheshkumar Champaklal Shah resident of 206, Mangal Jyot Tower, Jodhpur Gram Satellite, Ahmedabad for an amount of Rs 13,860 crore.

These declarations from Mumbai and Ahmedabad were kept pending for investigation about the genuineness of the same and were not included in the total value of declarations announced on 1st October, 2016 and. After due enquiry it was found that these declarants were persons of suspicious nature and very small means and the declarations could have been misused.

Therefore, after due consideration, the Income Tax Department decided by 30th November, 2016 , to reject these two sets of declarations of Rs. Two lakh Crore and Rs. 13860 Crore respectively. The Department has commenced enquiries against these declarants to determine the intention behind these false declarations.


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.