News Update

Delhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockGST - April month collections go past Rs 2 lakh crore threshold - peak to Rs 2.1 lakh croreCX - Alleged clandestine removal - Not replying to SCN on the ground that letter is not furnished by department is only a ruse as reliance is not placed on the same by the respondent authority for adjudicating the SCNs: SCGST - Proper officer observes that the reply filed is not satisfactory and since the assessee has nothing more to say, demand is confirmed - Officer has not applied his mind - Matter remitted: HCGST - Petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of registration - Petitioner does not seek to continue his business and has sought cancellation of registration - Order modified accordingly: HCGST - Seizing the outward movement of funds from petitioner's bank account - Life of an order of provisional attachment u/s 83(2) is only one year - HDFC Bank, henceforth, cannot restrain operation of bank account: HCTax - on Death and ContemplationDelhi, Noida schools receive bomb threats; Children sent back homeI-T- Writ court is not required to interfere with assessment order, where assessee also has available option of statutory appeal: HCED seizes Rs 90 Cr stored in crypto in Gaming App scamI-T-Transfer of assessment is sustained, where assessee does not reply to any notice issued in this regard & where valid reasons exist for transferring assessment: HCHM appeals Naxalism will be erased in 2 yrs if Modi voted back to powerAmerica softens offence related to use of marijuanaI-T - Rule 11UA does not mentions pre-condition of approval of balance sheet by Annual General Meeting: ITATAfter US & UK India comes third in terms of 79 mn cyber attacks in 2023: StudyCBIC revises tariff value of gold, silver & edible oils
 
I-T - Whether if non-compete fee is received as salary, any obligation to pay interest under Sections 234B & C, arises - NO: SC

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, DEC 19, 2016: THE issue before the Apex Court is - Whether if non-compete fee is paid in the form of salary under Sec 192, there is no question of any advance tax nor any interest obligation that arises. YES is the verdict.

Facts of the case

The
assessee was founder director of Log-In Systems Innovations Limited, the company engaged in the business of software development and consultancy. The company was acquired by one Synergy Credit Corporation Limited, as a result of which assessee was offered a position of Executive Director in the Acquirer Company for a gross compensation of Rs.1,77,200/- per annum. An Acquisition Agreement was executed on a going concern basis for a total consideration of Rs.6,00,000/-. On the same date, a Non-Compete Agreement was signed between the assessee and the Acquirer Company imposing a restriction on the assessee from carrying on any business of similar nature for a period of five years for which the assessee was paid a sum of Rs.21,00,000/-. The question that arose in the proceedings commencing with the Assessment Order is whether the amount of Rs.21 lakhs was on account of 'salary' or the same was a 'capital receipt'. The HC ruled that such a payment was 'salary amount' on which interest would be chargeable/leviable u/s 234B and 234C.

On appeal, the Apex Court held that,

++ against salary a deduction, at the requisite rate at which income tax is to be paid by the person entitled to receive the salary, is required to be made by the employer failing which the employer is liable to pay simple interest. In cases where receipt is by way of salary, deductions u/s 192 is required to be made. No question of payment of advance tax under Part 'C' of Chapter VII can arise in cases of receipt by way of 'salary'. If that is so, Part 'F' of Chapter VII dealing with interest chargeable in certain cases (Section 234B – Interest for defaults in payment of advance tax and Section 234C – Interest for deferment of advance tax) would have no application to the present situation in view of the finality that has to be attached to the decision that what was received by the assessee under the Non-Compete Agreement was by way of salary. For the said reasons, the appeals are allowed; the order of the High Court so far as the payment of interest u/s 234B and Section 234C is set aside.

(See 2016-TIOL-234-SC-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.