News Update

Maneka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemST - Appellant was performing statutory functions as mandated by EPF & MP Act, and the Constitution of India, as per Board's Circular 96/7/2007-ST , services provided under Statutory obligations are not taxable: CESTATKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamI-T - Scrutiny assessment order cannot be assailed where assessee confuses it with order passed pursuant to invocation of revisionary power u/s 263: HCHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningI-T - Assessment order invalidated where passed in rushed manner to avoid being hit by impending end of limitation period: HCColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashI-T - Additions framed on account of bogus purchases merits being restricted to profit element embedded therein, where AO has not doubted sales made out of such purchases: HCIndia to host prestigious 46th Antarctic Treaty Consultative MeetingI-T - Miscellaneous Application before ITAT delayed by 1279 days without any just causes or bona fide; no relief for assessee: HCAdani Port & SEZ secures AAA RatingI-T - Assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 54EC on account of investment made in REC Bonds, provided both investments were made within period of six months as prescribed u/s 54EC: ITATNominations for Padma Awards 2025 beginsI-T - PCIT cannot invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 when there is no case of lack of enquiry or adequate enquiry on part of AO: ITATMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDOI-T - If purchases & corresponding sales were duly matched, it cannot be said that same were made out of disclosed sources of income: ITATViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockI-T - Reopening of assessment is invalid as while recording reasons for reopening of assessment, AO has not thoroughly examined materials available in his own record : ITAT
 
Wealth Tax: Whether 'Stock Exchange Card' of recognised Stock Exchange held by non-defaulting member is an 'Asset' in hands of assessee and hence exigible to wealth tax – YES: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHEMDABAD, DEC 21, 2016: THE ISSUE IS - Whether the "Stock Exchange Card" of the Ahmedabad Stock Exchange held by a non-defaulting member is an "Asset" in the hands of the Assessee and hence exigible to wealth tax. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is a share broker and is a member of Ahmedabad Stock Exchange. The Stock Exchange had given him Card called as "Stock Exchange Card". For the AY 1991-92, the assessee submitted Wealth Tax Return, however treating the said "Stock Exchange Card" not an "asset". According to the assessee no tax was payable in respect of said Card. Assessing Officer held that the "Stock Exchange Card" is liable to Wealth Tax. On appeal, both CIT(A) & ITAT agreed with the views of AO.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ On analysis of the Rules of the Stock Exchange, it is observed and held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that right of the Membership with includs the right of nomination vests in the Exchange only when a Member commits default. Otherwise, he continues to participate in the trading session on the floor of the Exchange; that he continues to deal with other members of the Exchange and even has the right to nominate subject to compliance of the Rules;

++ In the present case, the assessee continues to hold the Card and is a non defaulting Member. Therefore, so long as assessee holds Membership Card and is non defaulting Member such a Membership Card can be said to be an "assets" within the definition of Section 2(e) of the Act, 1957 and on the same the assessee is liable to pay Wealth Tax.

(See 2016-TIOL-3070-HC-AHM-WT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS