News Update

Indian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthi’s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
ST - VCES, 2013 – No prudent business entity would jeopardize their chances of amnesty by deliberate non-payment of paltry amount – Penalty imposed u/s 78 set aside: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JAN 24, 2017: THE appellant is in appeal against o-in-o dated 31 st December 2015 of CCE, Aurangabad which invoked section 111(1) of Chapter VI of Finance Act, 2013 (Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013) empowering the Commissioner to place a declarant under the scheme on notice to be called upon to pay tax for filing a false declaration.

The impugned order proceeds on the factual matrix of appellant having declared Rs.39,03,995/- instead of Rs.40,80,693/-.

The declarant, in response to the notice intimated payment of the difference of Rs.1,76,699/- and also paid interest.

The impugned order imposed penalty of Rs.40,80,693/- u/s 78 of Finance Act, 1994 which appellant is aggrieved by.

In appeal before the CESTAT, the appellant submitted that they had miscalculated the tax liability as they were not aware of change in rates and that full payment of tax and interest had been made before issue of notice.

The Bench observed -

++ That full payment of tax and interest was made before issue of show cause notice is apparent. There is also no reason to attribute mala fide intent to evade tax as the shortfall was less than 3% of total dues. Surely, no prudent business entity would jeopardize their chances of amnesty by deliberate non-payment of such paltry amount.

++ The finding of suppression of fact with deliberate intent to evade tax appears to be erroneous. Considering the objective of the scheme and substantive compliance, imposition of penalty under section 78 of Finance Act, 1994 is unduly harsh and unwarranted.

The penalty imposed was set aside and the Appeal was allowed to that extent.

Quick reference:

Failure to make true declaration.

111. (1) Where the Commissioner of Central Excise has reasons to believe that the declaration made by a declarant under this Scheme was substantially false, he may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, serve notice on the declarant in respect of such declaration requiring him to show cause why he should not pay the tax dues not paid or short-paid.

(2) No action shall be taken under sub-section (1) after the expiry of one year from the date of declaration.

(3) The show cause notice issued under sub-section (1) shall be deemed to have been issued under section 73, or as the case may be, under section 73A of the Chapter and the provisions of the Chapter shall accordingly apply.

De minimis principle. See - 2016-TIOL-1382-HC-DEL-ST.

(See 2017-TIOL-213-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.