News Update

Another quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
I-T - Whether additions can be made on account of investment merely on basis of statement of original owners, in absence of evidences to show transfer of sale consideration - NO: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHEMDABAD, JAN 27, 2017: THE ISSUE IS - Whether an addition can be made on account of investment in property, merely on basis of statement of the original owners, when there is no evidence to show transfer of any sale consideration. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The assessee filed return of income for A.Y. 2008- 09 declaring total income at Rs.46,02,780/-. Assessment order u/s 143(3) was passed determining total income at Rs.2,00,31,830/- making after additions on account of Investment in purchase of land at Adalaj, Disallowance of interest and Disallowance u/s.14A. On appeal, CIT(A) deleted addition made by the A.O. on account of investment in purchase of land at Adalaj of Rs.74,50,000/- and confirmed the disallowance of interest of Rs.48,74,798/- out of total interest disallowance of interest of Rs.73,05,794/- and deleted the balance interest expenses of Rs.24,30,996/-. On further appeal, Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee and directed AO to delete addition of Rs.48,74,798/- made on account of disallowance of interest expenses. Tribunal dismissed the appeal preferred by the revenue against the order passed by CIT(A) deleting addition made by AO on account of investment in purchase of land at Adalaj.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ so far as both the assessees are concerned, they have never purchased the land situated at Adalaj from the original land owners i.e., Mr. Gandaji Thakore and others. As per their case and even sale deed produced on record, both the assessee purchased the land from one Mr.Hemendra Shah vide registered sale deed. It has come on record that said Mr.Hemendra Ahsh purchased the land situated at Adalaj from power of attorney holder of the original land owners – Mr.Gandaji Thakore and others and thereafter said Mr.Hemendra Shah sold the said land to the assessee. There is no iota of evidence on record to suggest that the assessee paid Rs.2.10 Crores to said Mr.Hemendra Shah. Solely on the basis of statements of the original land owners – Mr.Gandaji Thakore and others that they received sale consideration from Mr.Champavat, in whose favour sale deed was executed by them in the year 2008, as rightly held by CIT(A) and tribunal, A.O. was not justified in making addition on account of investment in purchase of land at Adalaj of Rs.74,50,000/-. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by tribunal in deleting addition made by the A.O. on account of investment in purchase of land at Adalaj of Rs.74,50,000/-.

(See 2017-TIOL-179-HC-AHM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.