SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

US Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
Cus - Charging of freight to Africa and de-stuffing containers at Dubai, by itself, does not attract penal provisions: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 15, 2017: THE main appellant is a shipping company and the second appellant is the managing director.

Both have been penalized under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962, holding that they had abetted M/s. Shree Khatoo Exports Ltd . in defrauding the Government by issuing shipping bills for Africa but unloaded the consignments at Dubai, which enabled M/s. Shree Khatoo Exports Ltd. to claim ineligible drawback.

The findings recorded by the Adjudicating authority while imposing penalties is -

"M/s. Sitara Shipping Ltd. has charged the freight of Rs.6,31,328/- for transportation of the goods to different African Ports from M/s. Shree Khatoo Exports Ltd. All the containers have been de-stuffed at Dubai as per consignee's request. However, M/s. Sitara Shipping Ltd. has neither refunded the freight charges to the said party, i.e. M/s. Shree Khatoo Exports Ltd., nor forwarded the freight charges from Dubai to South Africa to its tie-up agent, i.e. Masteq Freight Services, Dubai. In spite of repeated summons they could not provide sufficient information on this count. From this, it shows that M/s. Sitara Shipping Ltd. is aware that the cargo was to be off-loaded at Dubai. For this, they had taken the freight charges upto South African Ports for the reason that their cargo will not be checked on part with the Dubai cargo by the Customs Authority, as the mentioned cargo declared in the Bill of Lading was for South Africa."

The CESTAT observed that these "findings" of the Adjudicating authority for imposition of penalties are based on "surmises" inasmuch as section 114(i) is not invokable since -

- There is nothing on record to show that appellants were aware of the misdemeanor that was being supposedly undertaken by M/s. Shree Khatoo Exports Ltd.

- Charging of freight to Africa and de-stuffing containers at Dubai, by itself does not attract the penal provisions, as it is on record, that containers were de-stuffed at Dubai on request of the consignee, as in our opinion, a shipping company has to adhere to instructions of the consignees as to the unloading of cargo .

- That non-forwarding of freight charges from Dubai to Africa, by the main appellant herein cannot be per se held against the appellants.

It was, therefore, concluded that the impugned order to the extent it is challenged in these appeals is not sustainable. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief.

(See 2017-TIOL-819-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.

TOP NEWS

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST