News Update

India-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
I-T - A donor cannot be denied benefit u/s 35AC, on ground of malpractices in management of Trust, rules ITAT

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, MAR 17, 2017: THE ISSUE IS - Whether a donor can be faulted and denied benefit u/s 35AC, on ground of malpractices or discrepancy in the management of the Trust. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case:

The assessee had made donation of 2.5 crores to Mahila Utkarsh Sansthan Trust being an approved institution. The donations were deposited in the Trust's bank account. In this regard, the assessee also received from the trust the Form 58A for donations of 2 crores and Form 58A for the balance of 50 lakhs. However, a police complaint was lodged by the Trust President regarding the amounts deposited by secret donors in its bank account that these were withdrawn in huge amount by anonymous persons and no amount was received by the Trust for the utilization of its activities. The AO observed that since the intended donations as claimed by the assessee had not reached the actual trust as confirmed by the trustee, the donation made by the assessee was not truly and genuinely incurred for the activities of the trust. Accordingly, the AO denied relief u/s.35AC. The CIT(A), confirmed the action of the AO by observing that the statement of the President of the Trust clearly indicates that the assessee has diverted its taxable income under the garb of donation u/s 35AC which did not reach the objective of the Trust.

On Appeal, the Tribunal held that,

++ if there is a malpractice or misappropriation taken place in the Trust for which the assessee cannot be faulted and benefit u/s.35AC cannot be denied. Similar issue came for consideration before this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Mangal Tech Park Pvt. Ltd. In view of the binding order of the co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal, taking a consistent view, the issue in dispute remanded to the file of the AO to reexamine the issue on a similar direction and also the claim of assessee has to be considered as valid, if it has transferred the funds to the Bank account opened in the name of an institution which was duly registered u/s 35AC on the said dates of transfer of funds. Further, if there is a malpractice or discrepancies in the management of the Trust Account for which the assessee cannot be responsible so as to deny the benefit u/s 35AC.

(See 2017-TIOL-315-ITAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.