News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
Cus - Judicial Discipline demands that if Bench of Tribunal does not agree with decision of another Bench, correct course of action would have been to seek views of larger Bench: Supreme Court

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, APRIL 13, 2017: THIS appeal arises out of the final order dated 29.10.2014 reported AS - 2015-TIOL-66-CESTAT-MUM passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench, Mumbai.

The issue before the Tribunal was with regard to classification of Imaging Plates, IP Cassettes and FCR Capsula .

There was an order dated 20.02.2013 of the same Tribunal in the case of M/s. Jindal Photo India Pvt. Ltd. Reported in - 2013-TIOL-2200-CESTAT-MUM holding that Imaging Plates and IP Cassettes to be classifiable under Chapter 90 CTH 90189099 and, therefore, entitled to the benefit of notification No.21 /2002 dated 01.03.2002.

In the impugned order, the Tribunal did not accept the decision of the coordinate Bench in Jindal Photo India Pvt. Ltd. and took the view that the two items were more appropriately classifiable under Chapter 37 CTH 370110.

As benefit under the notification No.21 /2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002 was allowable in respect of Imaging Plates and IP Cassettes even if the same is to be classified under Chapter 37, the Tribunal, by the impugned order, held that the said two items will be eligible to the benefit of notification No.21 /2002 dated 01.03.2002.

The Supreme Court observed,

If the learned Tribunal was not in a position to accept the correctness of the decision of a coordinate Bench of the Tribunal, the correct course of action would have been to seek the views of a larger Bench. Judicial discipline demanded the quasi judicial authority i.e. the learned Tribunal to act in such a manner. That apart, the learned Tribunal seems to have found a case which was not even urged by any of the parties before it, namely, that Imaging Plates and IP Cassettes merit classification under Chapter 37.

The order of the Tribunal is set aside and the appeal is allowed by way of remand.

The Tribunal is requested to decide the matter as expeditiously as possible. All contentions available to the parties are left open.

(See 2017-TIOL-167-SC-CUS)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.