News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
Expenditure tax - Composite charges collected by hotel can be quantified only upon conclusion of stay of guests: HC

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, APRIL 26, 2017: THE issue is - Whether composite charges collected by a hotel can be quantified only upon conclusion of the stay of the guests, though a day to day account may have been maintained thereof. YES is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is in the business of running Hotels. During the subject year, the returns of Expenditure Tax were filed and orders of Assessment in terms of Section 9(2) of Expenditure Tax Act 1987 were issued by the AO in respect of A.Ys 1995-96 and 1997-98 respectively. In the course of Assessment, the AO noted that the Assessee had offered to tax chargeable expenditure of an amount of Rs.31,35,18,224/- as against which a sum of Rs.3,28,82,659/- had been paid leaving a sum of Rs.26,02,331/- outstanding. A stand was taken by the assessee at the time of assessment to the effect that the outstanding amount represented expenditure that was yet to be 'incurred' by the guests who had stayed at the hotels and that, upon such incurrence by the guests and collection by the hotel, the same would be paid over to the Government. In advancing this argument, the Assessee interpreted the provisions of Section 5 that defines 'Chargeable Expenditure' to mean such expenditure incurred that had been paid by the guests and duly received by the hotel. The stand of the Assessee was rejected by the AO who was of the view that the mercantile system of accounting followed by the Assessee, necessitated all expenditure that had accrued, to be offered to tax. The AO was of the view that the Assessee was bound to pay tax on the entire expenditure, irrespective of whether the same had been collected from the customers. On appeal, the Tribunal was of the view that the incurrence of expenditure for the purpose of chargeability thereof, would arise as and when the amount due by the guests were quantified by the hotel and an invoice raised in that regard. The Tribunal observed that in the case of those guests that were in occupation of rooms/use of hotel services as on the closing day of the year, the incurrence of expenditure could not be quantified midstay and till the actual raising of the bill.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ it is to be noted that Sub-section (1) of Section 5 addresses two situations, and refers to the 'incurrence of expenditure' or the 'payments made' in or to a hotel. The two references are akin to the mercantile and cash system of accounting respectively. There is no difficulty with respect to the second component, that is, payments actually made. The first component presents some scope for debate in so far as the expenditure can be incurred either on a day to day basis over the period of stay, which is the view of the Revenue, or upon conclusion of stay, at the time of check-out, which is the view of the assessee. The normal practice adopted by hotels in this regard would be of some relevance and bearing upon the issue. The expenditure incurred in a hotel is composite feature that takes into account the charges payable for accommodation, food, drink and other services that are offered along with the use of the room. Such composite charges can be quantified only upon conclusion of the stay of the guests though a day to day account may have been maintained thereof. We have noted earlier that the object of Section 5 r/w/s 3 would not extend to individual services provided at a hotel but a composite charge only. Thus, in a situation where at the close of the year a guest is still in occupation of a room in the hotel, the expenditure would not have been incurred and such event will only be triggered at the time of closure of stay by the guests in the hotel. In other words, it is the quantification of the expenditure at the time of raising of the composite bill that crystallizes and constitutes chargeable expenditure incurred for the levy of tax thereupon.

(See 2017-TIOL-797-HC-MAD-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.