SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

Bengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearElected Women of PRIs to Participate in CPD57 in New YorkIndia, New Zealand to have deeper collaboration in Pharma, Agriculture and Food ProcessingIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally slides to 58.8 in April monthDefence Secretary & Secretary General of MoD, Indonesia to co-chair 7th Joint Committee meetingAbove 7000 Yoga enthusiasts practised Common Yoga Protocol in SuratManeka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraft
 
Who should certify/verify goods seized by Customs/DRI - Collector or Judge? Question of Law left open - SC

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, MAY 03, 2017: THE ACT:

Sections 110(1A), (1B) and (1C)  of the Customs Act read as:

(1A) The Central Government may, having regard to the perishable or hazardous nature of any goods, depreciation in the value of the goods, with the passage of time, constraints of storage - page for the goods or any other relevant considerations, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify the goods or class of goods which shall, as soon as may be after its seizure under Sub-section (1) be disposed of by the proper Officer in such manner as the Central Government may. from time to time, determine after following the procedure hereinafter specified.

(1B) Where any goods, being goods specified under Sub-section (1A) having been seized by a proper Officer under Sub-section (1), he shall prepare an inventory of such goods containing such details relating to their description quality, quantity, mark numbers, country of origin and other particulars as the proper Officer may consider relevant to the identity of the goods in any proceeding under this Act and shall make an application to a Magistrate for the purpose of:

(a) certifying the correctness of the inventory so as prepared, or

(b) taking in the presence of the Magistrate, photographs of such goods, and certifying such photographs as true; or

(c) allowing to draw representative sample of such goods, in the presence of the Magistrate, and certifying the correctness of any list of samples so drawn.

(1C) Where an application is made under Sub-section (1B), the Magistrate shall, as soon as may be, allow the application.

In the instant case, DRI had seized 145.250 MT of Red Sanders wood vide Panchnama from the premises of C-315, Shahbad Daulatpur, Delhi02.01.2012. DRI approached the Metropolitan Magistrate ('MM') to certify the correctness of the inventory, who by an order dated 08.01.2013 directed the Petitioner (DRI) to obtain permission of the High Court for holding the Court at the CWC Warehouse, DSIDC, Narela for the purpose of certifying the correctness of the inventory prepared by the officers of DRI.

The High Court in its order dated 21.02.2013 reported as 2013-TIOL-1216-HC-DEL-CUS held that since the task of certifying the correctness of the inventory in respect of seized goods under Section 110 (1B) of the Customs Act is only an Executive function, in view of the provision of Section 3, sub-Section (4) of the Cr.P.C. the functions must be performed by an Executive Magistrate and not by a Judicial Magistrate .

The Petition by DRI was dismissed with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the Collector concerned of the area to perform the functions as laid down under Section 110 (1B) of the Act.

The DRI was aggrieved by this order of the High Court and took the matter to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition leaving the question of law open observing, "It is agreed that verification of the stocks in question, for the purpose of Section 110 (IB) of the Customs Act, 1962, be made by the Judicial Magistrate or any person authorised by him for the purpose. No objection shall be raised in this regard by the parties concerned."

For the present the LAW is open.

(See 2017-TIOL-200-SC-CUS)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.

TOP NEWS

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST