News Update

India to wait for Canadian Police inputs on arrest of men accused of killing Sikh separatist: JaishankarLabour Party candidate Sadiq Khan wins record third term as London MayorArmy convoy ambushed in Poonch sectorDeadly floods evict 70K Brazilians out of homes; 57 killed so farGovt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha Elections7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implication
 
Cus - No satisfactory explanation given for inordinate delay - casual approach by Department - 364 days delay not condoned - appeals dismissed: High Court

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, MAY 09, 2017: THE Customs Department has filed appeals against the common order of CESTAT - 2015-TIOL-3041-CESTAT-DEL and also seeks condonation of the delay of 364 days.

The explanation offered is -

2. Being aggrieved with the said impugned order, the appellant challenged the same before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by way of Civil Appeal. However, the same allowed to be withdrawn by the appellant vide Hon'ble Supreme Court's order Dated 27.11.2015 with the liberty to file appeal before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court within one month.

3. That even more delay was occasioned on account of reconstitution of Panel and the file was finally transferred to the present Counsel only in December, 2016.

4. That the certified copy of the order dated 27.11.2015 of the Hon'ble Supreme court was received by the application on 02.05.2016, where after the present appeal is being filed before this Hon'ble Court.

5. That in the process delay about 364 days has occurred in filing the present appeal which is neither intentional nor deliberate but due to the above said bonafide reasons.

6. That if the said delay is not condoned it would lead to irreparable loss to the applicant in terms of revenue.

Terming the above explanation as unsatisfactory, the High Court had directed the Revenue to file a better affidavit explaining the delay occasioned in the filing of the appeals.

When the matters were called out recently (two months after the above direction) the counsel for the Appellant stated that despite sending a long e-mail to the Department seeking the details for preparing the affidavit, he was yet to receive instructions.

The High Court, therefore, observed -

+ This itself shows how casually the Department is treating these matters.

+ The Supreme Court in its order dated 27th November, 2015 permitted the Department to withdraw the appeals and approach this Court after recording the statement of the Attorney General for India appearing for the Department that the appeals would be filed before this Court within one month from that date.

+ Therefore, the appeals were required to be filed not later than 26th December 2015 or at the latest the opening day of the Court in January 2016. The computerised log maintained by the Court shows that they were in fact filed on 10th January 2017.

+ The Court finds no reason why more time should be granted for filing a better affidavit particularly when there is already considerable unexplained delay in filing the appeals and more than two months' time was available to the Department since the previous hearing, to file a better affidavit.

+ No attempt has been made to give a satisfactory explanation for the inordinate delay, much less every day's delay, in filing the appeals. The Court, therefore, declines to condone the delay of 364 days in filing the appeals.

The appeals and the applications were dismissed.

In passing : Keywords - 15 crores Drawback case by DRI…the blame game begins…!

(See 2017-TIOL-865-HC-DEL-CUS)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.