News Update

20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTATBlinken says China trying to interfere US Presidential pollsWorld Energy Congress 2024: IREDA CMD highlights need for Innovative Financing Solutions
 
I-T - 'Non-encashment of cheques' would not save 'entries of credit' appearing in books of a/c for which no plausible explanation was furnished, from rigours of Sec 68: HC

By TIOL News Service

ALLAHABAD, JUNE 12, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT IS - Whether 'non-encashment of cheques' would save the 'entries of credit' appearing in books of a/c for which no plausible explanation was furnished, from the rigours of Section 68. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The assessee has been a company engaged in manufacturing and trading of activated bleaching earth. The assessee, in the relevant year, had credited account of six persons in the books of accounts as having received advance by way of unsecured loans from those persons. The AO by applying sec 68 of the Act, treated the said amount as income of the assessee chargeable to tax. The appeal of the assessee before the CIT(A) and Tribunal failed. Counsel for the assessee argued that in view of the findings recorded by the authorities the payment of the aforesaid amount of Rs.15,00,000/- shown as unsecured loan was received by means of different cheques but these cheques were never presented and encashed and, as such, the entry in the books of accounts regarding the sum only shows hypothetical income which could not be subjected to tax.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ in the case at hand, there is no dispute that the assessee had received cheques for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- and entries in this regard were made in his books of accounts having received the said amount by way of unsecured loans from various persons. The assessee has also offered an explanation regarding the above entries but the explanation was not found to be satisfactory by the Assessing Officer and it was held that the aforesaid entries were in the nature of accommodation entries so as to raise bogus liabilities.The submission is that the entry of credit in the books of accounts may be relevant only when there is a cash transaction and not where the payment is through the cheques unless the cheques are cleared and encashed.Section 68 of the Act is clear enough as it uses the term "sum is found credited in the books of accounts of the assessee". It does not make any distinction between any cash or cheque transaction. The sum found credited in the books of accounts of the assessee includes within its fold, the entry either by way of cash or by cheque irrespective of the encashment of the cheques.In view of the above, both the essential conditions for applicability of Section 68 of the Act stands fulfilled. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we answer the question of law, as formulated above, in favour of the revenue and against the assessee and hold that despite non-encashment of the cheques by the assessee, the entries of credit appearing in his books of accounts for which no plausible explanation to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer was furnished would attract Section 68 of the Act and the sum so credited by the entries would be deemed to be income of the assessee chargeable to tax.

(See 2017-TIOL-1086-HC-ALL-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.