News Update

NCGG commences Programme for officials of TanzaniaGST - Appellate Authority has not noticed the provisions of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 which mandates that the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced, is also to be excluded: HCDefence Secretary commends BRO for playing major role in country's securityGST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that the reply filed was insufficient, he could have sought more clarification - Without providing any such opportunity, impugned order could not have been passed - Matter remanded: HCSC holds influencers, celebrities equally accountable for misleading adsGST - Notice requiring petitioner to furnish additional information/clarification does not mention that petitioner had to appear for personal hearing - Since no opportunity of personal hearing was given, order is unsustainable: HCIndian Naval ships arrive at Singapore; to head towards South China SeaGST - For the purposes of DNB and FNB courses, petitioner clearly falls within the scope of an educational institution imparting education to students enrolled with it as a part of a curriculum - Services exempted: HCIndia's MEDTECH industry holds immense potential: Dr Arunish ChawlaKejriwal’s judicial custody extended till May 20GST - Candidates appearing for the screening tests are not students of the petitioner - Petitioner's claim of exemption on such examination fees is unmerited: HCBrisk voting reported from all 96 LS seats; PM casts vote in AhmedabadGST - NEET examinations are in the nature of an entrance examination - Petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of an exemption by virtue of Serial No.66(aa) of the 2017 Notification, which came into effect on 25.01.2018: HCIndia calls back half of troops stationed at MaldivesIndia-Australia DTAA: Economic Statecraft through TaxRBI alerts against misuse of banking channels for facilitating illegal forex tradingTime Limit to file Appeal in GST Appellate TribunalEC censures Jagan Reddy & Chandrababu Naidu for MCC violationsFrance tells Xi Jinping EU needs protection from China’s cheap importsI-T- Addition cannot be made merely for reason that assessee got property transferred through registered sale without making payment to vendor: ITATI-T- Addition which is not based on the reasons for reopening is un-sustainable sans notice u/s 148 of the ACT: ITATOxygen valve malfunction delays launch of Boeing’s first crewed spacecraftFM administers Oath to Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as first President of GST TribunalGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in Haryana
 
Cooperative society entitled to Sec 80P(2)(a)(i) benefits on interest from FDs: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

BANGALORE, JULY 13, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IS - Whether a co-operative society is eligible for claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) on the interest earned on the FDs placed with banks, this being a part of its business income. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case:

The assessee, a cooperative society filed return for relevant AY in which it had claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The AO was of the opinion that the assessee fell within the definition of a cooperative bank given in clause (ccv) of Section 5 of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949. Therefore, according to him, sub-section (4) of section 80P stood attracted. The said sub-section specifically stated that the provisions of section 80P would not apply to a cooperative bank. Though the assessee argued that it had transactions only with its members and not public, this contention was not accepted by AO. The AO held assessee was not eligible for a deduction u/s 80P(2)(i) of the Act. On appeal, the CIT(A) held that assessee was entitled to exemption u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act.

On appeal, the ITAT held that,

++ one of the main object of assessee society was providing credit facility to its members. Out of substantial sum received as deposits from the members, only small portion were given by assessee as loans to its members. Major part of the funds were parked in FDs. However, it is an admitted position that assessee was bound to give interest to its members on the deposits received by it from them. Therefore, when there were no takers for the money, which assessee as a part of its objects wanted to lend, the only available choice for assessee, in order not to keep the funds idle, was to place it in banks for earning interest. The High Court in the case of CIT v. Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd held that interest income is attributable to carrying on the business of banking and therefore it is liable to be deducted in terms of Section 80P(1) of the Act;

++ the judgement of jurisdictional High Court clearly mentioned that the money meant for lending, remaining surplus, there being no takers, if deposited in banks for earning interest, such interest income would be attributable to the business of banking carried out by the assessee.Facts of the case here fit perfectly well with the facts in the judgment mentioned above. It was therefore, held that assessee was eligible for claiming deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, on the interest earned on the FDs placed by it with banks, this being a part of its business income.

(See 2017-TIOL-1025-ITAT-BANG)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.