News Update

Indian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
Cus - When appeal is admitted by Apex Court, whether order appealed is stayed or not makes no difference - Tribunal should not overreach jurisdiction: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JULY 27, 2017: IN the matter of the appeals filed, the preliminary plea taken is that DRI has issued show cause notice without jurisdiction as has been held in Mangali Impex - 2016-TIOL-877-HC-DEL-CUS.

Incidentally, in this matter, the CBEC had issued an Instruction dated June 29, 2016 wherein it is inter alia informed -

"…Since the order dated 03.05.2016 of High Court of Delhi challenges the constitutional validity of sub-section (11) of Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, the Board has decided to file an SLP in the case i.e. W.P.NO.441/20013 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

3. In view of the above, field formations are requested to  transfer all the SCNs issued by DRI,DGCEI, SIIB, Preventive prior to 06.07.2011 and which are pending adjudication to the Call Book,  till disposal of the matter in the Supreme Court."

So also, different Benches of Tribunal have taken view that the matter should go back to the original authority for passing appropriate order on the basis of the apex Court's decision in the above case.

Revenue, on the other hand, opposes above proposition on the ground that the Bombay High Court in the case of Sunil Gupta - 2014-TIOL-1949-HC-MUM-CUS had held that DRI has jurisdiction to issue show cause notice for the material period.

The Division Bench, therefore, observed -

"3. In view of the rival submissions as above and also the Tribunal having taken a view that the appeal should go back to the adjudicating authority till the decision of the apex Court, it is proper to send back all the appeals to the adjudicating authority who shall pass appropriate order on the basis of outcome of the apex Court judgment in MangaliImpex case which has been admitted in Civil Appeal No. 20453 of 2016 …, granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to both the sides. We may state that when an appeal is admitted by apex Court whether the order appealed is stayed or not makes no difference to law since the order appealed is under challenge and the Tribunal should not overreach the jurisdiction of the apex Court as has been held by the apex Court in Union of India v. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. … 2004-TIOL-14-SC-LMT-LB ."

All the five appeals were remanded to the adjudicating authority.

In passing: Also see DDT 2879 & DDT 2970 .

(See 2017-TIOL-2619-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.