News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveysST - Since Department itself admits that service carried out by appellant is that of 'Mining Services' w.e.f. 01.06.2007, thus demand for earlier period has been made only to fasten excess Service Tax demand on appellant which cannot sustain: CESTATICG rescues fisherman with head injury onboard IFB St. Francis off the Gujarat coastCX - When physical stock verification carried out by Officers was not fool proof and there were anomalies, benefit of doubt should be extended to assessee, duty demand confirmed on alleged clandestine removal is not sustainable: CESTAT
 
VAT - Revenue Department has no authority to forcibly collect post dated cheques from raiding parties, in name of unascertained tax arrears: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHEMDABAD, JULY 29, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT IS - Whether Revenue Department has any authority to forcibly collect post dated cheques from raiding parties, in the name of unascertained tax arrears. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The petitioner dealer is a proprietory concern and is dealing in chemicals for which purpose the petitioner enjoys registration under the VAT Act as well as the CST Act. During the subject year, the VAT Authorities carried out raid on the business premises of petitioner, wherein which they collected six post dated cheques. Subsequently, the Commercial Tax Officer attached the petitioner’s house where his office was also situated, for unpaid tax arrears in exercise of powers u/s 45 of VAT Act.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ this court has criticized the tendency of the officers of the raiding parties to forcibly collect post dated cheques towards unascertained and unassessed tax liabilities. The admitted position is that no assessment, final or provisional, has been made containing such demand for the period during which the authorities are assessing the petitioner’s liability of tax and interest. It is, therefore, difficult to appreciate that the petitioner would have voluntarily agreed to pay such sum for which he would have willingly given post dated cheques. There is no authority in law in which the tax authorities can forcibly collect post dated cheques. Under the circumstances, the respondents are directed to not present the post dated cheques collected from the petitioner for realisation and return the said cheques. We make it clear that in present case, the raid was carried out on 02.05.2017, when the cheques were collected and the petition was filed promptly on 08.05.2017 without any loss of time. This would, therefore, demonstrate the petitioner’s bona fides. If in a given case, upon issuing the post dated cheques the assessee has gained some benefit or avoided certain tax liability and thereafter moved the court after a long period of time, such conduct would be one of the factors which the court may take into consideration in the process of deciding whether the post dated cheques were voluntarily given or not and whether in any case discretion in exercise of writ jurisdiction should be granted or not.

In passing :  Please also see 2017-TIOL-955-HC-DEL-CX

 

(See 2017-TIOL-1427-HC-AHM-VAT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.