News Update

GST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
ST - Inward or outward remittance is regulated by RBI - payment received in INR is deemed to be convertible forex in view of FEMA regulations : CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, AUG 11, 2017: DURING the course of audit of the accounts of the appellant in November, 2010, the officers noted that the appellants have provided services relating to marketing or procurement of goods from India and such services were provided to M/s. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries India Ltd., Japan.

The Revenue entertained a view that such services rendered by the appellant will fall under the taxable category of "Business Auxiliary Services" and do not qualify as "Export of Service" in view of non-fulfilments of one of the essential conditions viz. receipt of payment in convertible foreign exchange.

For the period April, 2005 to March, 2009, the Commissioner confirmed a service tax liability of Rs.2,69,44,983/- and imposed equal amount of penalty.

The appellants are contesting this order and submit that there are two essential conditions for "Business Auxiliary Services" to qualify as export of service -

(a) The consumption of such service should be outside India and

(b) payment for such services is to be received by the appellant in India, in convertible foreign exchange.

It is further emphasised that the payment for the services have been made in conformity with the statutory provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and Foreign Exchange Management (Manner of Receipt and Payment) Regulations, 2000 namely Regulations 3 and 4 (2) inasmuch as the payment has been made in foreign exchange but credited to the appellant's account in India in the form of rupees and FIRC has been issued by the Bank, which maintained the account of the appellant, in New Delhi.

The AR, while reiterating the findings of the lower authorities, submitted that receipt of consideration in Indian currency will not satisfy the condition for export of service.

The Bench inter alia observed -

++ A reference to Regulation 4(2) of Foreign Exchange Regulation 2000 will show that a person shall be deemed to have repatriated the realized foreign exchange to India when he receives in India payment in rupees from the account of a bank situated in any country outside India.

++ Admittedly, inward or outward remittance of any money into or out of India is regulated by the Reserve Bank of India. There is a specific enactment and the Regulation in this regard. Notification No.9/2005-ST dated 3.3.2005 under which Export of Services Rules, 2005 was issued mentions the condition as payment for such service is to be received by a service provider in convertible foreign exchange. The manner of such payment to be received and how convertible foreign exchange is dealt with for cross border transactions, is wholly regulated by the RBI.

++ It is relevant to note that when a service is provided to a person located abroad and the conditions is payment of consideration in convertible foreign exchange, the same shall stands satisfied, if the recipient of service transfers the money from his account which is in convertible foreign currency and remitted to Indian provider of service. The credit to account of Indian recipient of money at the bank of Indian recipient, will necessarily be in Indian rupees. It is apparent that no foreign exchange amount can be credited in bank located in India. The transactions are in Indian rupees.

After extracting the findings of the Tribunal in cases of Balaji Tele Films Ltd. -  2016-TIOL-685-CESTAT-MUM and Sun-Area Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. - 2015-TIOL-956-CESTAT-MUM, the Bench concluded that there was no merit in the impugned order.

The same was, therefore, set aside and the appeal was allowed.

(See 2017-TIOL-2893-CESTAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.