News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
I-T- Industrial undertaking formed by transfer of used plant & machinery, cannot claim deduction u/s 80IB(2): HC

By TIOL News Service

ALLAHABAD, SEPT 19, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THIS COURT IS - Whether new industrial undertaking constituted by transfer of used plant & machinery, is eligible for claiming deduction u/s 80IB(2) of the Act. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee company was incorporated for running a Flour Mill. There was another company known as M/s. M.C. Roller Flour Mills Limited. It had two units known as M.C. Roller Floor Mills and Shri Ram Flour Mills. The second unit of the aforesaid company was purchased by the assessee as a whole including its plant and machinery. Accordingly, the said unit Shri Ram Flour Mills stood transferred to the assessee and came under its control and management. Thereafter, the Assessee company filed its return claiming deduction u/s 80IB, which was however denied by the AO, on the ground that the it had been formed by splitting up, or the reconstruction of a business already in existence; and it was also formed by the transfer to a new business of machinery or plant previously used for any purpose.

High Court held,

++ the transfer of the used plant and machinery may not result in splitting and reconstruction of the existing industrial undertaking, but nevertheless when an unit as a whole is transferred, it includes the transfer of plant and machinery which was in use by the existing unit of a separate legal entity for the formation of a separate industrial undertaking. This kind of transfer is clearly hit by clause (iii) of Section 10A(2) and not by clause (ii) of Section 10A(2) of the Act. At the cost of repetition, it is important to remind that clause (iii) of Section 10A(2) is identical and para-materia to clause (ii) of Section 80-IB(2). The purpose behind permitting the deduction u/s 80-IB is to promote setting up of a new industrial undertaking by purchasing new plant and machinery. In the event, setting up of an industrial unit by purchase of old/used plant and machinery is permitted, it would defeat the entire purpose of allowing deductions u/s 80-IB of the Act;

++ in the case at hand the fact remains as has been recorded by the tribunal that there is transfer of plant and machinery of the unit Shri Ram Flour Mills of M/s. M.C. Roller Flour Mills Limited to the assessee company. The plant and machinery of the said unit was in use by the previous company. Therefore, the assessee company is not an industrial undertaking formed by the purchase of a new plant and machinery rather than by the transfer of previously used plant and machinery. Thus, transfer may not have amounted to splitting or reconstruction of business already in existence. Nonetheless, it amounts to constituting a new industrial undertaking by the transfer of used plant and machinery. The conclusion of what has been discussed above is that the assessee does not satisfy the condition contained in clause (ii) of Sub-section (2) of Section 80-IB for purposes of claiming deductions under the said provision.

(See 2017-TIOL-1923-HC-ALL-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.