News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
I-T - Interest income earned by co-operative society from keeping surplus funds in banks, will not qualify for deduction u/s 80P: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

AHEMDABAD, SEPT 20, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IS - Whether interest income earned by co-operative society from keeping surplus funds in banks, will be taxable u/s 56 and will not qualify for deduction u/s 80P. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee had filed its return declaring income of Rs. Nil. Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny, wherein the AO noticed that the assessee had shown gross total income at Rs. 16,96,744/- and after claiming deduction under Chapter VI-A. The AO rejected the claim of Assessee u/s. 80P(2)(a) by stating that as per Section 80P(4) inserted by the Finance Act 2006 from A.Y 2007-08, deduction u/s. 80P would not be available to any co-operative bank. On appeal, the CIT(A) provided part relief to the assessee stating that interest income of Rs. 13,88,824/- received on F.D. would be taxable u/s. 56 and would not qualify for deduction u/s. 80P of the act.

Tribunal held that,

++ we noticed that the assessee was not operating u/s. 5(b) of the Banking Regulation Act as the assessee was not allowed to accept deposit of money from the public and do other banking activities as defined in the section 5(b) of the Banking Regulation Act. We forther noticed that the assessee was a co-operative society registered under Registrar of Co-operative Society Mehsana, Mehsana, Gujarat State engaged in taking deposits from its members and providing advances to its members with the object of promotion and development of its members. In view of the above facts and the detailed findings provided by the CIT(A), we considered that the assessee is not a co-operative bank u/s. 80P(4) of the act;

++ we also noticed that the assessee claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(i) on the interest income of Rs. 13,88,824/- received on fixed deposit. We find that CIT(A) held that this interest income earned from keeping the surplus funds in banks or other investment would be taxable and will not qualify for deduction u/s. 80P. In this connection, we have perused the judicial pronouncement of the Supreme Court in the cases of Totgors Co-operative society Ltd. Vs. ITO Karnataka - 2010-TIOL-11-SC-IT in which it was held that interest income earned on investing in short term deposits would fall in the category of "other income" to be taxed u/s. 56. Therefore, we find no merit in the contentions of the counsel for considering the interest income on fixed deposit as business income.

(See 2017-TIOL-1288-ITAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.