News Update

Jio turns world’s top telco in terms of data trafficIndia takes part in 'Institutionalization of SMART Government for Improving Service Delivery' in LondonGadkari faints during campaign; Heat takes toll on his health'Sunflowers were the first ones to know' - film by FTII student selected at CannesSARFAESI Act - Award of interest on auction money at rate applicable to fixed deposits is not a correct view and rate of interest deserves to be enhanced: SC (See 'TIOLCorplaws')ST - Chit Funds - Tax was not paid under mistake of law but upon demand by tax authorities - Refund not having been filed within time was rightly rejected: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsGST - Without considering reply on merits, proper officer has held that reply is unsatisfactory and, therefore, he is left with no alternative but to create demand - Order set aside: HCGST - Cancellation of registration retrospectively - Show Cause Notice and the impugned order are bereft of any details, accordingly the same cannot be sustained: HCGST - Registration could not have been cancelled retrospectively for the period for which returns were filed and taxpayer was compliant: HCGST - Notfn 11/2017-CTR amended by 03/2022 - Work contracts executed before 18 July 2022 - Petitioners should file refund claims before respondent agitating grievance and same be examined and orders passed within 4 months: HCItaly imposes USD 10 mn fine on Amazon for unfair business practicesGST - Entire tax liability has been realised by appropriating the amount from the petitioner's bank account, therefore, Revenue interest stands fully secured - Since tax proposal was confirmed without participation of petitioner, order set aside and matter remanded: HCCaste Census is my mission, says RahulRight to Sleep - A Legal lullabyUS warns Pak of punitive sanctions against trade deal with IranI-T- Income surrendered before approaching Settlement Commission not covered u/s 115BBE, where this provision did not exist during relevant AYs: HCChinese companies decry anti-subsidy probe by EUI-T- Entire interest expenditure is allowable as deduction if loan funds is not diverted for non-income earning activities/personal purposes : ITATUK to send military aid package worth USD 619 mn to UkraineUS regulator bans non-compete agreements by employeesAir India, Nippon Airways join hands for travel between India and JapanSC grills Baba Ramdev & Balkrishna in misleading ad case
 
Treading GST Path - XXXIV - GST on OIDAR Service - Certain doubts

 

OCTOBER 04, 2017

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

SECTION 2 (17) of the IGST Act, 2017 defines Online information and database access or retrieval services" (OIDAR) as

"online information and database access or retrieval services" means services whose delivery is mediated by information technology over the internet or an electronic network and the nature of which renders their supply essentially automated and involving minimal human intervention and impossible to ensure in the absence of information technology and includes electronic services such as, -

(i) advertising on the internet;

(ii) providing cloud services;

(iii) provision of e-books, movie, music, software and other intangibles through telecommunication networks or internet;

(iv) providing data or information, retrievable or otherwise, to any person in electronic form through a computer network;

(v) online supplies of digital content (movies, television shows, music and the like);

(vi) digital data storage; and

(vii) online gaming;

Section 13 of the IGST Act lays down the manner of determination of place of supply of services, if either the supplier or recipient of the supply of services is outside India. As per sub section (12) thereof,

(12) The place of supply of online information and database access or retrieval services shall be the location of the recipient of services.

Explanation . - For the purposes of this sub-section, person receiving such services shall be deemed to be located in the taxable territory, if any two of the following non-contradictory conditions are satisfied, namely:-

(a) the location of address presented by the recipient of services through internet is in the taxable territory;

(b) the credit card or debit card or store value card or charge card or smart card or any other card by which the recipient of services settles payment has been issued in the taxable territory;

(c) the billing address of the recipient of services is in the taxable territory;

(d) the internet protocol address of the device used by the recipient of services is in the taxable territory;

(e) the bank of the recipient of services in which the account used for payment is maintained is in the taxable territory;

(f) the country code of the subscriber identity module card used by the recipient of services is of taxable territory;

(g) the location of the fixed land line through which the service is received by the recipient is in the taxable territory.

Let us take the case of an Indian Service provider, offering OIDAR services like providing various online contents through their website, where some of the subscribers are from outside India.

Take the case of a subscription package (eg. of a tax news portal) which is valid for a particular period and the consideration is paid in advance.

As per Section 13 (12) ibid, the place of supply of such services would be the location of the service recipient, which is abroad and hence no GST is payable and the activity may also qualify as export of service, subject to fulfilment of the conditions prescribed for this purpose.

But the Explanation under Section 13 (12) is bothersome, according to which, if any two of the non-contradictory conditions mentioned therein are satisfied, the location of the service recipient shall be the place of supply and shall be deemed to be in taxable territory (i.e. India) and hence GST would be attracted.

In this connection, the following questions require to be clarified.

(i) What is the significance of the term "non-contradictory" conditions? Does it mean that the listed out conditions are already non-contradictory or one has to check whether the two conditions which are being satisfied are "non-contradictory" or not? If so, how to decide whether any two conditions are contradictory or non contradictory?

(ii) In case of subscription packages which are valid over a period of time, at the time of receiving the payment it cannot be concluded as to whether any of the two conditions would be satisfied during the validity period or not. For example, a person based out of India, who has subscribed to the subscription package, may travel to India during the validity period and may satisfy conditions (d), (f) and (g) under the Explanation to Section 13 (12). But at the time of receiving the payment and raising an invoice, how to decide the place of supply? Similarly, when periodical payments are involved, some payments made may be made in such a way that conditions (b) and (e) would be satisfied.

It is earnestly hoped that the CBEC would clarify these issues at the earliest.

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.