News Update

ST - Amendment made to FA, 1994 on 14.05.2015 making service tax applicable retrospectively on chit-fund business is only prospective - Refund payable of tax paid between 01.07.2012 to 13.05.2015: HCST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Amnesty Scheme, being of the nature of an exemption from the requirement to pay the actual tax due to the government, have to be considered strictly in favour of the revenue: HCCX - Issue involved is valuation of goods u/r 10A of CE Valuation Rules, 2000 - Appeal lies before Supreme Court: HCCus - Smuggling - A person carrying any article on his belonging would be presumed to be aware of the contents of the articles being carried by him: HCCus - Penalty that could be imposed for smuggling 3.2 kg of gold was Rs.88.40 lakhs, being the value of gold, but what is imposed is Rs.10 lakhs - Penalty not at all disproportionate: HCCus - Keeping in mind the balance of convenience and irreparable injury which may be caused to Revenue, importer to continue indemnity bond of 115 crore and possession of confiscated diamonds to remain with department: HCCus - OIA was passed in October 2022 remanding the matter to adjudicating authority but matter not yet disposed of - Six weeks' time granted to dispose proceedings: HCI-T - High Court need not intervene in matter involving factual issues; petitioner may utilise option of appeal: HCChina asks Blinken to select between cooperation or confrontationI-T - Unexplained cash credit - additions u/s 68 unsustainable where based on conjecture & surmise alone: ITATHonda to set up USD 11 bn EV plant in CanadaI-T - Re-assessment is invalid where based only on a suspicion that income escaped assessment & where not based on concrete reasons to believe for commencing such proceedings : ITATImran Khan banned from flaying State InstitutionsI-T - Income from sale of flats cannot be computed in assessee's hands, where legal possession of flats had not been handed over to buyers in that particular AY: ITATPro-Palestine demonstration spreads across US universities; 100 arrestedI-T - Investment activities in venture capital which are not covered in negative list under Schedule III to SEBI Regulations, qualifies for deduction u/s 10(23FB): ITATNATO asks China to stop backing Russia if keen to forge close ties with WestCus - When Department has not complied with time limit, the order issued for revocation of licence or order issued for continuation of suspension licence cannot sustain: CESTATNY top court quashes conviction of Harvey Weinstein in rape caseWeather prediction normal for phase 2 poll dayIndiGo orders 30 Airbus A350s for long haulsST - Appellant is an 'authorised medical practitioner' providing 'healthcare services' - services exempted in terms of clause 2(i) of notification 25/2012-ST: Commr(A)RBI to issue fresh guidelines for banks to freeze suspected bank accounts being used for cyber crimesREC avails SACE-Covered Green Loan for 60.5 Billion Japanese YenStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideCus - 'Small Form-factor Pluggable Optical Transceivers' are classifiable under CTH 8517 7090 and not under CTH 8517 62 90 - entitled for benefit of duty concession under 57/2017-Cus: CESTATDoNER discusses Development of Tourism in North EastCX - Appellant is eligible for exemption under Notfn 12/2012-CE upon fulfilling all conditions stipulated therein, thus sufficiently establishing that goods dealt with by Appellants qualify for exemption: CESTAT
 
Receipt of Services - when to avail Credit under GST Law

OCTOBER 09, 2017

By Lakshmi Ratna Kancherla, Advocate

IN the present article, an attempt is made to analyse "at what point in time" the input tax credit in respect of tax paid services is available to a registered person under the GST Law.

In the service sector, it is common to collect a lumpsum amount for services to be provided over a period of time ranging from six months to three years. In such cases, the suppliers' (service provider) issue invoice, charges and collects the tax to be deposited to the Government. The question is the point in time when the credit of such tax is available to the recipient.

An examination of the position under the erstwhile law and the GST Law is carried out infra -

Credit of Input Service - Position under the Erstwhile Law (Finance Act, 1994 & CCR, 2004)

Under the erstwhile law i.e., the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as "Finance Act") read with Rule 4(7) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, the service provider/manufacturer was entitled to avail the credit of the Service Tax paid on input service immediately on or after the day on which, invoice [ Under the Service Tax Law, invoice was required to be issued within thirty days from the date of provision of service in terms of Rule 3 of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011.] , bill or as the case may be challan is received. Among others, the credit was allowed subject to the condition that the value of service and service tax has been paid within a period of 90 days.

Prior to 2011 i.e., before introduction of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011, the credit in respect of the input service was allowed on or after the day on which payment was made of the value of service and service tax as indicated in the invoice.

Credit of Input Service-Position under the Goods and Service Tax Law

Section 16 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "CGST Act") lays down the conditions for taking input tax credit. Section 16(2)(b) of the CGST Act, provides that no registered person shall be entitled to the credit of any input tax in respect of any supply of goods or services or both to him unless he has received the goods or services or both.

A perusal of the erstwhile law and the GST Law indicates that this condition of "receipt of service" is a new concept introduced in the GST to determine admissibility of credit.

This brings us to the pertinent question viz. "when is service received?" for the purpose of Section 16 in a situation the supplier collects payment for the service in advance for the services to be provided over a period of time and issues invoice and discharges appropriate GST on such amounts received. It is to be noted that most of time the invoice is issued much before the provision of service has commenced.

Reference may be made to Explanation to Section 13 (2) of the CGST Act which lays down provisions in respect of time of supply of services. The relevant extract is as follows:

"(2) The time of supply of services shall be the earliest of the following dates, namely :-

(a) the date of issue of invoice by the supplier, if the invoice is issued within the period prescribed under sub-section (2) of section 31 or the date of receipt of payment, whichever is earlier; or

(b) the date of provision of service, if the invoice is not issued within the period prescribed under sub-section (2) of section 31 or the date of receipt of payment, whichever is earlier; or

(c) …………

………….

Explanation. -For the purposes of clauses (a) and (b) -

(i) the supply shall be deemed to have been made to the extent it is covered by the invoice or, as the case may be, the payment;"

A perusal of the above indicates that, in order to determine the time when the service is provided, the supply shall be deemed to have been made to the extent covered by the invoice. The Legislature appears to have included the said provision out of abundant caution so that no assessee claims the very fact that supply of service has taken place even if the situation has not arisen.

Accordingly, the registered person should be entitled to avail the credit of the input service in the situation in hand, taking a cue from the Explanation to Section 13 on the basis that service is deemed to have been provided on receipt of invoice or on the date of making the payment itself .

However, in the absence of any reference of the said Explanation to Section 16(2)(b) of CGST Act, 2017, it is not possible apply the same for the purpose of taking credit unless the registered assessee satisfies the condition of receipt of service.

It is pertinent to note that there is a similar provision under Explanation to Section 12(2) of the CGST Act, which has been envisaged for determining time of supply of goods as well. In fact, application of the similar provision for goods may not be acceptable since conventionally "receipt" of goods is equated to actual receipt. Hence, where receipt of goods is equated to actual receipt, it may not be acceptable to adopt a different yardstick for services.

The fact remains that unlike goods, services are intangible and the only measurable means would either be making of payment or receipt of invoice as available under the erstwhile law. The services are deemed to have been provided and consumed simultaneously hence there is no question of any deferment of the receipt. Hence, the assessees should be entitled to take the credit on receipt of the invoice even in a situation where the actual provision of service may take place at a later point in time.

Keeping in view the anomaly as indicated above and the fertile minds of the audit parties and the revenue officer, strictly interpreting the provision, there are chances of the credit not being allowed in such cases.

The legislature is thus required to suitably amend the provision pertaining to receipt of services by issuing suitable amendment / clarification in this regard considering the time limit in taking credit and due to the fact that it will not be commercially viable for any assessee to defer availment of credit which is otherwise legally permissible.

(The views in this article are strictly personal)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Receipt of Services - when to avail Credit under GST Law

Nice article. As per provisions Invoice is not be issued for the advances received though the GST has to be paid on such advances in terms of Time of supply provisions. In respect of advances received the supplier is required to issue Receipt Voucher which is not a valid document to avail ITC. Hence, it appears that it is a conscious decision to not to allow credit of tax paid on advances in view of the facts mentioned above and provisions are also in tune with each other. But conceptually since tax is collected it has to be allowed as ITC also as it was in earlier regime.

Posted by mallikarjun reddy c
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.