News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Receipt of Services - when to avail Credit under GST Law

OCTOBER 09, 2017

By Lakshmi Ratna Kancherla, Advocate

IN the present article, an attempt is made to analyse "at what point in time" the input tax credit in respect of tax paid services is available to a registered person under the GST Law.

In the service sector, it is common to collect a lumpsum amount for services to be provided over a period of time ranging from six months to three years. In such cases, the suppliers' (service provider) issue invoice, charges and collects the tax to be deposited to the Government. The question is the point in time when the credit of such tax is available to the recipient.

An examination of the position under the erstwhile law and the GST Law is carried out infra -

Credit of Input Service - Position under the Erstwhile Law (Finance Act, 1994 & CCR, 2004)

Under the erstwhile law i.e., the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as "Finance Act") read with Rule 4(7) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, the service provider/manufacturer was entitled to avail the credit of the Service Tax paid on input service immediately on or after the day on which, invoice [ Under the Service Tax Law, invoice was required to be issued within thirty days from the date of provision of service in terms of Rule 3 of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011.] , bill or as the case may be challan is received. Among others, the credit was allowed subject to the condition that the value of service and service tax has been paid within a period of 90 days.

Prior to 2011 i.e., before introduction of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011, the credit in respect of the input service was allowed on or after the day on which payment was made of the value of service and service tax as indicated in the invoice.

Credit of Input Service-Position under the Goods and Service Tax Law

Section 16 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "CGST Act") lays down the conditions for taking input tax credit. Section 16(2)(b) of the CGST Act, provides that no registered person shall be entitled to the credit of any input tax in respect of any supply of goods or services or both to him unless he has received the goods or services or both.

A perusal of the erstwhile law and the GST Law indicates that this condition of "receipt of service" is a new concept introduced in the GST to determine admissibility of credit.

This brings us to the pertinent question viz. "when is service received?" for the purpose of Section 16 in a situation the supplier collects payment for the service in advance for the services to be provided over a period of time and issues invoice and discharges appropriate GST on such amounts received. It is to be noted that most of time the invoice is issued much before the provision of service has commenced.

Reference may be made to Explanation to Section 13 (2) of the CGST Act which lays down provisions in respect of time of supply of services. The relevant extract is as follows:

"(2) The time of supply of services shall be the earliest of the following dates, namely :-

(a) the date of issue of invoice by the supplier, if the invoice is issued within the period prescribed under sub-section (2) of section 31 or the date of receipt of payment, whichever is earlier; or

(b) the date of provision of service, if the invoice is not issued within the period prescribed under sub-section (2) of section 31 or the date of receipt of payment, whichever is earlier; or

(c) …………

………….

Explanation. -For the purposes of clauses (a) and (b) -

(i) the supply shall be deemed to have been made to the extent it is covered by the invoice or, as the case may be, the payment;"

A perusal of the above indicates that, in order to determine the time when the service is provided, the supply shall be deemed to have been made to the extent covered by the invoice. The Legislature appears to have included the said provision out of abundant caution so that no assessee claims the very fact that supply of service has taken place even if the situation has not arisen.

Accordingly, the registered person should be entitled to avail the credit of the input service in the situation in hand, taking a cue from the Explanation to Section 13 on the basis that service is deemed to have been provided on receipt of invoice or on the date of making the payment itself .

However, in the absence of any reference of the said Explanation to Section 16(2)(b) of CGST Act, 2017, it is not possible apply the same for the purpose of taking credit unless the registered assessee satisfies the condition of receipt of service.

It is pertinent to note that there is a similar provision under Explanation to Section 12(2) of the CGST Act, which has been envisaged for determining time of supply of goods as well. In fact, application of the similar provision for goods may not be acceptable since conventionally "receipt" of goods is equated to actual receipt. Hence, where receipt of goods is equated to actual receipt, it may not be acceptable to adopt a different yardstick for services.

The fact remains that unlike goods, services are intangible and the only measurable means would either be making of payment or receipt of invoice as available under the erstwhile law. The services are deemed to have been provided and consumed simultaneously hence there is no question of any deferment of the receipt. Hence, the assessees should be entitled to take the credit on receipt of the invoice even in a situation where the actual provision of service may take place at a later point in time.

Keeping in view the anomaly as indicated above and the fertile minds of the audit parties and the revenue officer, strictly interpreting the provision, there are chances of the credit not being allowed in such cases.

The legislature is thus required to suitably amend the provision pertaining to receipt of services by issuing suitable amendment / clarification in this regard considering the time limit in taking credit and due to the fact that it will not be commercially viable for any assessee to defer availment of credit which is otherwise legally permissible.

(The views in this article are strictly personal)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Receipt of Services - when to avail Credit under GST Law

Nice article. As per provisions Invoice is not be issued for the advances received though the GST has to be paid on such advances in terms of Time of supply provisions. In respect of advances received the supplier is required to issue Receipt Voucher which is not a valid document to avail ITC. Hence, it appears that it is a conscious decision to not to allow credit of tax paid on advances in view of the facts mentioned above and provisions are also in tune with each other. But conceptually since tax is collected it has to be allowed as ITC also as it was in earlier regime.

Posted by mallikarjun reddy c
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.