News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Suspension of reverse charge - side effect

 

OCTOBER 20, 2017

By V Ravindran  & R Alwan, Advocates, Chennai

SECTION 9 covers levy and collection of GST. As per Sec.9(1) of CGST, 2017, GST is levied on "supply of goods or services or both" in the manner specified. Section 9(2) enables levy of GST on Petroleum products on and from a date to be recommended by GST Council.

Sub-section 9 (3) and 9 (4) of CGST Act, and the notifications issued under these sub-sections provide as under:-

Extract of provisions of Sec.

Notification(s) issued under CGST

Categories covered

9(3) The Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification, specify categories of supply of goods or services or both, the tax on which shall be paid on reverse charge basis by the recipient of such goods or services or both and all the provisions of this Act shall apply to such recipient as if he is the person liable for paying the tax in relation to the supply of such goods or services or both.

- No. 13/2017 - Dated: 28-6-2017 - CGST Rate, ++ as amended by Notfn.No. 33/2017 CTR

- Goods Transport Agency (GTA);

- An individual advocate including a senior advocate or firm of advocates.

- An arbitral tribunal.

- Services provided by any person by way of sponsorship to any body corporate or partnership firm.

- Central Government, State Government, Union territory or local authority;

- A director of a company or a body corporate

- Services supplied by an insurance agent to any person carrying on insurance business.

- Services supplied by a recovery agent to a banking company or a financial institution or a non-banking financial company.

- Author or music composer, photographer, artist, or the like

- Supply of services by the members of Overseeing Committee to Reserve Bank of India ++

9(4) The central tax in respect of the supply of taxable goods or services or both by a supplier, who is not registered, to a registered person shall be paid by such person on reverse charge basis as the recipient and all the provisions of this Act shall apply to such recipient as if he is the person liable for paying the tax in relation to the supply of such goods or services or both.

--No. 8/2017 - Dated: 28-6-2017 - CGST Rate

@@ Amendment brought through Notification No. 38/2017 CGST Rate dt. 13.10.2017

Supplies of goods or services or both received by a registered person from any supplier , who is not registered.

--Exemption shall not be applicable where the aggregate value of such supplies of goods or service or both received by a registered person from any or all the suppliers, who is or are not registered, exceeds five thousand rupees in a day.

@@ proviso (viz. the above proviso --) stands removed, till 31.03.2018.

Questions have been raised as to whether the supplies from unregistered persons, particularly those under the 10 categories listed under Notification No. 13/2017 CTR [covered under Sec.9(3)] would also be exempt from GST at the hands of registered receiver because of the amendment brought through Notification No. 38/2017 CGST Rate dated 13.10.2017.

Some clarifications in the websites appeared to the effect that since the levy of GST on supplies of goods/services or both under RCM under Section 9(4) of CGST cases alone stand exempted upto 31.03.2018, the said exemption under Notification No. 8/2017 - dated 28-6-2017 (as amended), would not cover the categories of supplied specified under Sec. 9(3) and consequently there would be no exemption from GST for the recipients of services under 10 categories notified under Notification No.13/2017 CTR (As amended by No. 33/2017 CTR dated 13.10.2017).

A careful study of the above provisions of sub-sections 9(3) and 9(4) reveals the following:-

-  The provisions 9(3) is to empower Govt. to notify receivers of supply as person liable to pay GST under RCM, and the provision 9(4) stipulates that "supply of taxable goods or services or both by a supplier, who is not registered, to a registered person shall be paid by such person on reverse charge basis as the recipient ";

-  Exercising sub- section 9(3), Govt. specified categories of supply of goods or services or both the tax on which shall be paid on reverse charge basis by recipients,

-  Sub-section 9(4) itself fastened GST liability under RCM, on any registered person, who receives supplies from supplier who is not registered. By exercising its general power of exemption under Sec. 11(1), the government exempted supplies not exceeding in value of Rs.5000/- per day (till amendment on 13.10.2017, when this ceiling was removed).

With the removal of the cap under Notification No.8/2017 CGST, the only criteria to avail the GST exemption under Notification No. 8/2017 CTR is that the registered person should receive the supply from a non-registered supplier. There is a distinct possibility that all those suppliers of goods or services or both, covered under Section 9 (3) could also remain unregistered.

In view of the above, in the absence of specific restriction / bar under Notification No. 8/2017 CTR, (as amended by Notification No. 38/2017 CTR), any registered person, when he receives supplies of goods or services from unregistered persons (including the supply of services from the 10 categories, who are covered / specified under sub-section 9(3) read with Notification No. 13/2017 CTR), can claim the benefit of GST exemption under Notification No.8/2017 CTR as amended.

If the intention of the Govt. was not to allow the exemption under Notification No. 8/2017 CTR to those categories specified under Notification No. 13/2017 CTR, then there is a need to include a proviso to that effect under Notification No. 8/2017 CTR.

Notification No.8/2017 CTR might have been meant for allowing exemptions to select species originally, but after the amendment through Notification No. 38/2017, the exemption route under Notification No. 8/2017 is no more exclusive, but available to all who receive from unregistered persons. Plain words of Notification No. 8/2017, after its amendment, unequivocally allows exemption to supplies from all suppliers who are not registered which could include categories specified under section 9(3).

Same thing would apply to SGST/UTGST.

The moot point is whether the above effect was int ended or not ?

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Specific Provsion

I personally feel, Notification does not give edibility for RCM suspension on purchases from specified categories of services under 9(3). Notification 8/2017 is for section 9(4). Section 9(3) is specific provision which overrides general provision 9(4).

Posted by Siva Rama
 
Sub: No side effect on RCM

Sir,
Supplies notified for RCM payment under Section 9(3) may not get the extension of time upto 31.3.2018 that is meant for supplies covered under Section 9(4)of CGSTA for RCM payment. Reason is that Govt exempted services notified under Section 9(3) for RCM payment from obtaining registration in terms of Notfn No.5/2017-CT dt 19.6.2017. It seems exempted entities cannot be equated with unregistered entities covered under Section 9(4).

Posted by rrkothapally rrkothapally
 
Sub: Suspension of reverse charge - side effect - Point to Ponder

If the point discussed is valid, the same is applicable even to the services that are notified under Sec 9(3) and that do not exceed Rs.5000 from the date of issue of Notification No. 08/2017 - CT(R), it self. Why from the date of issue of Notification No.38/2017 - CT(R) only.Is it not correct.

Posted by prakash ch
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.