News Update

GST - Sushil Modi Panel says e-Way Bill to be introduced from April 1, 2018PNB fraud - ED seizes 21 properties worth Rs 523 Cr of Nirav Modi including farm house in Alibaug and residential houses in Mumbai & PuneIGI Airport Customs nabs two pax with gold worth Rs 2.8 Cr concealed in machineryPNB fraud - FM raps regulators for failure; calls them unaccountableDiu now connected with Ahmedabad by Air; PM launches Rs 1000 Cr development schemeFormer FM P Chidambaram moves Apex Court for protection of his fundamental rightsViolations by Foreign Accounting Firms - SC asks Govt to set up Panel (See 'Corp Brief' in '')Chartered Accountants Act - For purpose of enforcing statutory code of conduct against Multinational Accounting Firms, there is need to set up expert panel to exmaine regulatory framework: SC (See Legal Desk' in '')Export - Pre-requisites and precautions for successful processing of IGST refund claims - alternative mechanism with officer interface to give exporters an opportunity to rectify invoice mismatch errors - Board guidelinesGovt to take strict action in financial irregularities cases: PMM/s Clearsynth enters into agreement for sale of 20 tonnes of Heavy Water annuallyBIS favours standardization in Big DataSecretary Textiles inaugurates five-day Handicraft & Gifts FairGST - refund to exporters - GSTN confirms application for Rs 13000 Crore; verifies and forwards Rs 5000 Cr to CBEC for disbursalCGST - Directions u/s 168 - Taxpayers to give undertaking that they will not utilise ‘disputed credit’ or ‘blocked credit’ in cases where amount exceeds Rs 10 lakhs - Board warns of stern actionScrews & SIM socket or other mechanical items for cellular mobile phone not entitled for concessional BCD of 10%37 Additional Judges recommended for appointment as full-fledged JudgesNo Anti-dumping duty on 'Toluene Di-Isocyanate' imported from China, Japan & Korea for period 05.12.2017 to 22.01.2018 due to lapse of provisional NotificationGovt gets serious about appointing Lokpal; to hold meeting on March 1Refund of Integrated tax paid on goods/services exported - retro amendmentSales Tax - 'sale price' apart from including consideration for sale, also includes value of any discount or rebate offered, which is to be deducted from sale price: SCGST - GoM on IT to review progress made by GSTN so far on SaturdayRailways inducts two digitally enabled LocomotivesADB loans USD 84 mn for improving water supply in Bhagalpur & GayaIAS Association delegation meets Dr Jitendra SinghFodder scam - Laloo pleads for bail; Jharkhand HC says NOIES officers to get new houses soonIndia successfully testifires N-capable ballistic missile ‘Dhanush’ from Naval Ship off Orissa coastIndian, Canadian PMs resolve to expedite BIPA & CEPA pactsElectoral Bond Scheme to open on Mar 1 for 10 daysNDMA organises workshop on action plan to deal with heat wave
Cus - Public order should be passed by public authority publicly to serve public interest - Litigant should not made remediless: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, NOV 14, 2017: THE Appellant is before the CESTAT against a letter of the Deputy Commissioner dated 25.9.2017 conveying the decision of Commissioner.

The Member (Judicial) writing for the Division Bench observed –

"It is settled principle of law that a public order should be passed by public authority publicly to serve public interest. But that should not be a decision conveyed by his subordinate without being passed publicly and behind the back of the appellant. This is the jurisprudence laid down by the Apex Court decision in the case of Commissioner of Police, Bombay vs. Gordhandas Bhanji reported in AIR 1952 SC 16. Also the basic principle of judicial discipline is that a person who hears should pass an order and should not fancifully communicate his order through a subordinate who has not heard the matter. This is the position of law laid down by Apex Court in the case of Gullapalli Nageshwar Rao vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation - AIR 1958 SC 308."

Accordingly, the Bench directed the Commissioner to pass a public order hearing the appellant publicly without communicating his decision through a subordinate.

It is further mentioned –

"4. The communication of the Deputy Commissioner does not specify the reason why the appellant has to carry out the direction of his superior communicated by him without an order of a quasi judicial Authority. Reason being heartbeat of justice, absence thereof buries justice.

5. While passing appropriate order, learned Authority shall grant reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant and record its pleadings as well as evidence. Stating reason of his decision, he shall pass appropriate order."

The Chief Commissioner, Customs was also advised to issue appropriate guidelines to the field officers so as to ensure that a litigant is not made remediless.

(See 2017-TIOL-4000-CESTAT-MUM)