News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Treading GST Path - XXXVII - GST on Hotels

 

NOVEMBER 20, 2017

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

THE rate of GST payable by different types of Hotels / Restaurants, has undergone a lot of changes vide Notification 46/2017 Central Taxes (Rate) Dt. 14.11.2017, with effect from 15.11.2017 and an attempt is made in this article to explain the changes.

As per S.No. 7 of Notification 11/2017 Central Taxes (Rate) Dt. 28.06.2017, with effect from 01.07.2017, the various Hotel related transactions are subjected to different rates of GST under nine (9) categories, which are tabulated below in simple language. The total rate of GST including the corresponding SGST rates is mentioned in the table.

S.No.

Nature of Service

Rate of GST (CGST + SGST or IGST)

Remarks

 

Food related services.

   

(i)

Supply of food in a restaurant, which is not having the facility of air-conditioning / central heating / licence to service alcoholic liquor

12 %

S.No. 7 (i) of Notification 11/2017

(ii)

Supply of food in a restaurant, which is having licence to service alcoholic liquor

18 %

S.No. 7 (iii) of Notification 11/2017

(iii)

Supply of food in a restaurant, which is having the facility of air-conditioning / central heating

18 %

S.No. 7 (iv) of Notification 11/2017

(iv)

Outdoor catering

18 %

S.No. 7 (v) of Notification 11/2017

(v)

Supply of food, along with renting of place (Convention, meetings, etc)

18 %

S.NO. 7 (vi) of Notification 11/2017

 

Accommodation Related Services

   

(i)

Accommodation in Hotels, etc. where the declared room tariff above Rs.1000 per day and below Rs.2500 per day

12 %

S.No. 7 (ii) of Notification 11/2017

(ii)

Accommodation in Hotels, etc. where the declared room tariff above Rs.2500 per day and below Rs.7500 per day

18 %

S.No. 7 (vi) of Notification 11/2017

(iii)

Accommodation in Hotels, etc. where the declared room tariff above Rs.7,500 per day

28 %

S.No. 7 (viii) of Notification 11/2017

(iv)

Accommodation, Food and beverage Services, other than those covered above

18 %

S.No. 7 (ix) of Notification 11/2017

It may be observed from the above that the GST rate for food related services was based on whether the restaurant is having the facility of air-conditioning / central heating / licence to service alcoholic liquor, or not. If any of these facilities are not available, the rate would be 12 % and if any one of these facilities are available, the rate of GST would be 18 %.

The above entry S.No. 7 has been amended vide Notification 46/2017 Central Taxes (Rate) Dated 14.11.2017 with effect from 15.11.2017. It may be observed that the relevance of availability of the facilities of air conditioning / central heating / licence to service alcoholic liquor, to determine the GST rate has been completed dispensed with . But, the rate of GST would depend upon the declared tariff of the room in the place. But there are lot of Restaurants without any lodging facility and what GST rate would apply for such restaurants? We will come back to this question little later.

To tabulate the changes -

S.No.

Nature of Service

Rate of GST (CGST + SGST or IGST)

Remarks

 

Food related services.

   

(i)

Supply of food in a restaurant, which is located in a lodging premises, where the declared tariff per room is below* Rs.7,500

5 %

Without availing any ITC. S.No. 7 (i) of Notification 11/2017, as amended by Notification 46/2017

(ii)

Supply of food in a restaurant, which is located in a lodging premises, where the declared tariff per room is above Rs.7,500

18 %

S.No. 7 (iii) of Notification 11/2017 as amended by Notification 46/2017

(iii)

Accommodation, Food and beverages services not covered under any of the entries under S.No. 7

18 %

S.No. 7 (ix) of Notification 11/2017 as amended by Notification 46/2017.

* Seems the intention is to mention below, but the notification reads as "above" which seems to be an error.

Coming back to the above question, as to what would be the rate applicable for stand-alone restaurants, which do not have any lodging facility, the explanation under S.No. 7 (iii) provides an answer, which is reproduced below.

Explanation.- For the removal of doubt, it is hereby clarified that, supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or drink, where such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, whether for consumption on or away from the premises where such food or any other article for human consumption or drink is supplied, other than those located in the premises of hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes having declared tariff of any unit of accommodation of seven thousand five hundred rupees and above per unit per day or equivalent shall attract central tax @ 2.5% without any input tax credit under item (i) above and shall not be levied at the rate as specified under this entry.

So stand-alone restaurants would attract 5 % GST, if they do not avail any ITC. They have to pay 18 % if they avail ITC, as per S.No. 7 (ix).

Now, the next question is if a restaurant situated in a lodging facility where rooms of different categories are available, where the declared tariff of some of the rooms are below Rs.7,500 per day and some of them are above Rs.7,500 what rate of GST would apply?

A careful reading of the entries reveal that if the declared tariff of "any unit" is above Rs.7,500, then the rate would be 18 %.

It may also be noted that the above rates would apply for take away food also, as consumption of both " in*" or "away" from the Hotel is covered.

* Instead of the word "in", the word "on" is used.

Certain nagging questions -

Next question is - what would the GST rate, if food is ordered through room services, by a person who is staying in a Hotel. Whether the supply of food in that case has to be treated as a composite supply, along with accommodation and since the principal supply being accommodation, the rate applicable for accommodation (depending upon the declared tariff) would apply or the GST rates separately prescribed for food supply would apply?

What if he, instead of ordering through room service, goes to the restaurant and takes his food, what would be the rate?

It may be noted that under S.No. 7 (v) outdoor catering would attract 18% and this has not undergone any change. The term "outdoor catering" has not at all been defined in GST law. If so, in what circumstances 18 % rate under S.No. 7 (v) would apply? What is the status of factory canteens run by contractors? What about Home delivery of food?

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: No option for restaurants to charge 18 percent with ITC

Sir, from November 15, 2017 onwards, all restraunts and takeaways are mandatorily required to pay tax @ 5% without any input tax credit. This is evident from the explanation to entry no.7 (ix) of the notification no. 46/2017-Central tax (rate) dated November 14, 2017. Accordingly, it appears that there is no option available for stand-alone restaurants to charge 18% and avail credit.

Posted by PricewaterHouse Coopers
 
Sub: Standalone Restaurants

Sir,
In substituted S.No.7 (i)there seems to be no error in using "above" instead of "below", phrase used is other than.. 7500 and above, so it includes below 7500 as well as standalone restaurants.
The explanation added in substituted (ix) makes it clear that tax shall be 5%,there is no option or scope to charge 18%. It is also reinforced by not including (i) in the residual entry (ix)of S. No.7, though all other besides (i) and omitted (iv) are included therein.






Posted by GURJIT BHULLAR
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.