News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
GST on exhibitors in India International Trade Fair

 

NOVEMBER 21, 2017

By G Mohana Rao, Assistant Commissioner (Retd.)

INDIA International Trade Fair started on 14th November, 2017 and will continue till 27th November, 2017. Over time, this has become an annual prestigious event with the maximum footfalls amongst business visitors as well as consumers. The companies from different countries as well as the local ones showcase their products to prospective business clients and consumers.

First of all, due to continuing renovation resulting in space constraints, the stalls are lesser in number and smaller in size. Some of the gates are also not operational resulting in less public reaching some of the stalls. To add to the woes of the exhibitors, just one day before, Delhi government issued notice to ITPO, the organisers, asking them to ensure that each and every exhibitor is registered as non-resident taxpayer. The concern of the State government is correct as they stand to lose all the revenue if such goods are not taxed or if already taxed in other states, the taxes so paid need to be transferred to them.

As per the GST Law, such persons need to register at least five days before the start of the exhibition and need to pay the estimated tax liability in advance. Most of the exhibitors had not done so. While registering,the non-resident taxpayers require a local authorised signatory to sign on their behalf. In many cases, their direct interface is with the ITPO which refused to act as one. Meanwhile, some enterprising people seeing a business opportunity started a stall for helping the exhibitors in registering and filing returns. In many cases, the exhibitors were simply showcasing the products without supplying any goods. They are obviously not required to register as they will not be supplying anything.

In many cases, the exhibitors have paid duty at the time of imports and would be entitled to credit of Integrated tax paid at the time of import. The huge amounts of GST paid by them to the ITPO for booking the stalls would also be available as credit. Similarly those applying for casual taxable person would also have paid taxes on goods brought by them. In many cases, it would be CGST and SGST of the respective States where they are registered. They need to show this as stock transfers and convert the taxes so paid into IGST so that they can use the credit of the same while paying taxes in Delhi. They would also get the credit of GST paid by them for all the logistics employed by them like packing, transport etc. Net to net, they stand to gain on getting all credits and it would lower their costs as well. The exhibitors need to determine their estimated liability in advance based on these factors as well, so that they pay the right amount of GST before taking registration and do not have to go through the rigmarole of claiming the refunds later especially in view of the refund module being not ready and claiming the refunds in physical mode would again subject them to following the procedures which can be avoided if little carefulness is practiced.

It is not clear whether ITPO has informed the foreign exhibitors in advance about the need to register under GST at the time of allotting space to them. In fact, they should have informed about it, educated them about GST and helped them in registering for GST,wherever necessary. It is seen that they themselves were clueless of the requirement. The State government too instead of waiting for the event to start and create a chaos should have played a pro-active role and informed the ITPO about the requirements in advance. All these small steps go a long way in carrying the image of the departments, the government and the country as a whole. The carrot of credits by the exhibitors is good but the procedures for the same should not act as a STICK for them to neutralise the benefits. Pre-planning is essential and pre-requisite for the success of any international or national level event. A lesson needs to be learnt from this experience, so that such mistakes could be avoided in future!!!

(The author is Partner, Elysian Tax Advisors, Mumbai and the views expressed above are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.