News Update

Brazil’s proposal to tax super-rich globally finds many takers in G20 GroupCPM manifesto promising annihilation of all weapons of mass destructions including nuclear, draws flak from Defence MinisterBiden favours higher steel tariff on ‘cheating’ China + may up tariff on dominant solar tech suppliersUS Poll: Biden trumps Trump in money race by USD 75 mnNetanyahu says Israel to decide how and when to respond to Iran’s aggressionGoogle slays costs by laying off staffers & shifting roles outside USCoast Guard apprehends Indian fishing boat with unauthorised cashI-T - Sales supported by payments through banking channel which were not only disclosed in VAT returns but duly verified & accepted by VAT Department, cannot be treated as bogus to invoke Sec 68: ITATSPACE, testing & evaluation hub for sonar systems, set up by DRDO, inaugurated in KeralaGST - Malabar 'Parota' Is Akin To 'Bread', Exigible To 5% GST: HCST - Principles of constructive res judicata applies - Petitioner cannot seek to assail proceedings on grounds which were available to be raised in first round of litigation: HCHeavy downpours drown Dubai; Airport issues travel advisoryGST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that any further details were required, the same could have been specifically sought before passing any order - Matter remitted: HCHM pledges to make India completely Maoist-freeGST - Proper Officer has not applied his mind to the reply submitted and has merely held it to be devoid of merits - Order set aside and matter remitted: HCGST - Order was issued without hearing the petitioner - It is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits: HCGST - Classification - It is incumbent on the respondent to duly consider all contentions raised by petitioner objectively without any pre-determination: HCGST - Whether the amount reflected as ITC tallies with the value of credit notes issued - Petitioner's explanation not duly examined - Matter remanded: HCGST Penalty of Rs. 3731 Crores on an employee!CCI okays acquisition of additional shareholding of Thyssenkrupp by Protos EngineeringMicrosoft to inject USD 1.5 bn in AI Group G42 of UAEDRDO organises workshop on 'Emerging Technologies & Challenges for Exoskeleton'Canadian budget proposes more taxes on higher income groups & tax credits for EVsI-T - Since application filed for condonation of delay is rejected by order without stating reason is set aside and application is restored for reconsideration: HCWorld leaders appeal for quick ratification of UN Ocean TreatyI-T- Re-assessment - if assessee submits objections thereto, then AO must pass order dealing with objections & also establish that facts presented by assessee are prima facie incorrect: HCUK House debates ban on smokingI-T- Deduction u/s 43B in respect of GST cannot be disallowed, where assessee is found to have paid GST before due date of filing ITR: ITATGlobal economy to grow at 3.2% in current year and also 2025: IMFGreat Barrier Reef in Australia suffers serious bleachingVAT - Input Credit - mere production of invoices or payment made by cheques/RTGS is enough to discharge burden of proof upon assessee: HCUS to impose fresh sanctions on Iran’s missile programmeDelhi Police nabs woman for thieving luxury SUVs
 
GST on supply of goods while same are in Customs Bonded Warehouse

 

NOVEMBER 28, 2017

By G Mohana Rao, Assistant Commissioner (Retd.)

WHAT happens if an importer imports goods and warehouses the same in Customs Bonded warehouse? He sells the goods to some other person while the goods are still in warehouse. Customs duty will be charged on the date of ex-bonding. Whether GST is to be charged on such a transaction? What is the time of supply in such a case? What is the place of supply? Attention of readers is drawn to Circular No. 46/2017-Customs dated 24.11.2017.

The proviso to Section 5(1) of the IGST Act, 2017 provides that integrated tax on goods imported into India shall be levied and collected in accordance with the provisions of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 on the value as determined under the said Act at the point when duties of customs are levied under section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962.

Thus, in respect of goods warehoused in Customs bonded W/H, the integrated tax shall have to be charged at the time of ex-bonding when the duties of Customs are charged. It happens many a times that the goods are further sold by the importer while the same are still in a warehouse. This is permitted in terms of Section 59(5) of the Customs Act, 1962 and the importer can transfer the ownership of the goods to another person. In such transactions, in the pre-GST period, some of the states were levying VAT, even though the Customs Duty used to be charged much later. The issue was litigated in Courts on the interpretation of term "crossing the Customs frontiers". I am not going into those due to two reasons – one, that the definition of Customs area has been amended so as to include Customs Bonded warehouse in its ambit and second, that VAT is subsumed in GST and it would be better to look into the issue afresh unless one needs to borrow any concept from those erstwhile case laws. I do not feel the need for doing so.

CBEC vide its Circular No. 46/2017-Customs dated 24th November, 2017 has issued a clarification which appears to have raised further questions than answers. The circular clarifies that the integrated tax shall be charged on such transactions at the time when the sale takes place. Integrated tax shall also be charged when the goods are ex-bonded from Customs bonded warehouse. The Customs Law does not have any provision for input tax credit. Thus, the goods would not only end up getting taxed twice but also result blocking of business funds..... which certainly is not the intention of the government . This appears to be an unworkable solution.

The basic question is whether IGST should be charged on the supply made by the importer while the goods are still warehoused. The transaction is a local one where both buyer as well as the seller is in India and in some cases with in one State as well. Since the transaction happens in the course of import, integrated tax, if any,is to be collected at the point when duties of customs are levied on the said goods under section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962i.e.date of ex-bonding of the said goods. Since the Circular is contradicting the Act, the circular appears to be ultra-vires and needs to be withdrawn.

The circular explained the issue by way of an illustration as follows:

- Goods imported by "A" on 2nd July 2017. Importer wants to deposit the goods in a bonded warehouse to defer duty.

- Importer files an "into bond bill of entry" and the goods are deposited in a Bonded Warehouse. BCD and IGST (Section 3(7) of Customs Tariff Act 1975) are deferred. Illustration of duty deferment:

A: Value of goods = Rs. 100

B: say BCD is 10% = Rs. 10 (10% of Rs. 100)

C: say IGST is 12% = Rs. 13.2 (12% of Rs. 110)

D: Duty Deferred (B+C) = 23.20#

- "A' sells the goods to "B" on 21st July 2017 for Rs. 300 and charges IGST of Rs. 36* @12% (IGST) Payment and filing of return for the same should be done by 20th August 2017.

- "B" files an Ex-bond Bill of entry on 25th of September 2017 and pays Rs. 23.20# (the deferred duty). (In addition to duty of Rs. 36* paid earlier).

In the above case, the importer would end up paying Rs. 36/- on 20th August, 2017 besides Rs.23.20 of deferred duty on the subject goods at the time of ex-bonding. It is felt that the viable solution to the issue could be deferring the charging of integrated tax on the sale transaction by the importer, at the time of ex-bonding. Thus, "B" should pay Rs. 23.20 on the Ex-Bond Bill of Entry in ICES. The same date should be the time of supply for the transaction between "A" to "B"and such transactions should be under reverse charge mechanism . Here again, ITC becomes an issue as it is not permitted in RCM. Second solution could be to amend the IGST Act, add a proviso in Section 5(1) stipulating that the value of such transaction shall be the sum of value determined under Customs Act, 1962 and the value addition be the one made by the importer while selling his goods.

It is felt that any solution to the issue should be by way of amending the Act be it the IGST Act, 2017 or the Customs Act, 1962. Mere circular may not only be not able to solve but also result in unnecessary litigation. As the law stands today, it appears such transactions are not taxable and the goods should only be taxed at the time of ex-bonding from customs on the value determined under the provision of Customs Act, 1962. By issue of the subject circular, the matter is rather complicated instead of clearing the murky waters. The issue needs to be addressed immediately since warehousing of imported goods and selling them in warehouse is very much prevalent and numerous in India!!!

(The author is Partner, Elysian Tax Advisors, Mumbai and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.