News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
GST on supply of goods while same are in Customs Bonded Warehouse

 

NOVEMBER 28, 2017

By G Mohana Rao, Assistant Commissioner (Retd.)

WHAT happens if an importer imports goods and warehouses the same in Customs Bonded warehouse? He sells the goods to some other person while the goods are still in warehouse. Customs duty will be charged on the date of ex-bonding. Whether GST is to be charged on such a transaction? What is the time of supply in such a case? What is the place of supply? Attention of readers is drawn to Circular No. 46/2017-Customs dated 24.11.2017.

The proviso to Section 5(1) of the IGST Act, 2017 provides that integrated tax on goods imported into India shall be levied and collected in accordance with the provisions of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 on the value as determined under the said Act at the point when duties of customs are levied under section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962.

Thus, in respect of goods warehoused in Customs bonded W/H, the integrated tax shall have to be charged at the time of ex-bonding when the duties of Customs are charged. It happens many a times that the goods are further sold by the importer while the same are still in a warehouse. This is permitted in terms of Section 59(5) of the Customs Act, 1962 and the importer can transfer the ownership of the goods to another person. In such transactions, in the pre-GST period, some of the states were levying VAT, even though the Customs Duty used to be charged much later. The issue was litigated in Courts on the interpretation of term "crossing the Customs frontiers". I am not going into those due to two reasons – one, that the definition of Customs area has been amended so as to include Customs Bonded warehouse in its ambit and second, that VAT is subsumed in GST and it would be better to look into the issue afresh unless one needs to borrow any concept from those erstwhile case laws. I do not feel the need for doing so.

CBEC vide its Circular No. 46/2017-Customs dated 24th November, 2017 has issued a clarification which appears to have raised further questions than answers. The circular clarifies that the integrated tax shall be charged on such transactions at the time when the sale takes place. Integrated tax shall also be charged when the goods are ex-bonded from Customs bonded warehouse. The Customs Law does not have any provision for input tax credit. Thus, the goods would not only end up getting taxed twice but also result blocking of business funds..... which certainly is not the intention of the government . This appears to be an unworkable solution.

The basic question is whether IGST should be charged on the supply made by the importer while the goods are still warehoused. The transaction is a local one where both buyer as well as the seller is in India and in some cases with in one State as well. Since the transaction happens in the course of import, integrated tax, if any,is to be collected at the point when duties of customs are levied on the said goods under section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962i.e.date of ex-bonding of the said goods. Since the Circular is contradicting the Act, the circular appears to be ultra-vires and needs to be withdrawn.

The circular explained the issue by way of an illustration as follows:

- Goods imported by "A" on 2nd July 2017. Importer wants to deposit the goods in a bonded warehouse to defer duty.

- Importer files an "into bond bill of entry" and the goods are deposited in a Bonded Warehouse. BCD and IGST (Section 3(7) of Customs Tariff Act 1975) are deferred. Illustration of duty deferment:

A: Value of goods = Rs. 100

B: say BCD is 10% = Rs. 10 (10% of Rs. 100)

C: say IGST is 12% = Rs. 13.2 (12% of Rs. 110)

D: Duty Deferred (B+C) = 23.20#

- "A' sells the goods to "B" on 21st July 2017 for Rs. 300 and charges IGST of Rs. 36* @12% (IGST) Payment and filing of return for the same should be done by 20th August 2017.

- "B" files an Ex-bond Bill of entry on 25th of September 2017 and pays Rs. 23.20# (the deferred duty). (In addition to duty of Rs. 36* paid earlier).

In the above case, the importer would end up paying Rs. 36/- on 20th August, 2017 besides Rs.23.20 of deferred duty on the subject goods at the time of ex-bonding. It is felt that the viable solution to the issue could be deferring the charging of integrated tax on the sale transaction by the importer, at the time of ex-bonding. Thus, "B" should pay Rs. 23.20 on the Ex-Bond Bill of Entry in ICES. The same date should be the time of supply for the transaction between "A" to "B"and such transactions should be under reverse charge mechanism . Here again, ITC becomes an issue as it is not permitted in RCM. Second solution could be to amend the IGST Act, add a proviso in Section 5(1) stipulating that the value of such transaction shall be the sum of value determined under Customs Act, 1962 and the value addition be the one made by the importer while selling his goods.

It is felt that any solution to the issue should be by way of amending the Act be it the IGST Act, 2017 or the Customs Act, 1962. Mere circular may not only be not able to solve but also result in unnecessary litigation. As the law stands today, it appears such transactions are not taxable and the goods should only be taxed at the time of ex-bonding from customs on the value determined under the provision of Customs Act, 1962. By issue of the subject circular, the matter is rather complicated instead of clearing the murky waters. The issue needs to be addressed immediately since warehousing of imported goods and selling them in warehouse is very much prevalent and numerous in India!!!

(The author is Partner, Elysian Tax Advisors, Mumbai and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.