News Update

India, Oman resolve to expediate talks for DTAATight schedule for Monsoon Session - 46 bills to be passed in 24 daysGovt proposes to amend law for Fastags for all commercial vehiclesCBDT Instruction No 3/18 - Board asks CCITs to wrap up withdrawal of appeals by Aug 20, 2018I-T - If assessee fails to establish urgent nature of business necessities for taking loans from its Directors in cash, such transaction warrants levy of penalty u/s 271D: ITAT Special BenchOECD employment rate raises by 0.2% in Q1SC asks Parliament to enact new law to deal with mobocracyST - If GOI department could be treated as using 'Residential Complex' constructed by NBCC for its 'personal use', how another Corporate body could be denied benefit of that type of user of 'Residential Complex' to be occupied by its Managerial Staff: HCPlace of removal - Valuation under CE & Customs Laws - past and present (See 'TOG INSIGHT' on '')India mulling safeguard duty on Chinese and Malaysian solar panelsGovt hikes basic import duty on many textile goodsIMF says India to be fastest growing economy in 2019CBDT prescribes registration form for Non-resident applicantsIs disallowing supplementary claim under MEIS & SEIS Scheme by DGFT valid?CX - On being pointed out, Assessee immediately reversed Credit wrongly availed - there cannot be said to be any fraud through which it wanted to evade Duty - setting aside of interest & penalty cannot be faulted: HCIGST refund - CBIC launches another fortnightly drive till July 30I-T - Complaint received against assessee is a reason to suspect but it is not a reason to believe that some income has escaped assessment untill AO verifies content of information before initiating re-assessment: ITATWCO Secretary General lauds India's efforts to use technology for trade facilitationBrahMos successfully test-fired from Balasore Test RangeIndia-Oman Joint Commission Meeting begins in MuscatHi-tech maritime labs launching programmes for traineesChina's GDP logs 6.8% growth in first half of fiscal20 hurt in pandal collapse during PM's Midnapore political rallyExports - Accountability of inputs - DGFT eases norms for Advance Authorisation holdersCustoms - CBIC expands list of exempt items for handicraft sectorI-T - Even if soil separated from land and put in containers it continues to be specie of land and income from growing mushrooms in such containers under controlled environment is agri income exempt u/s 10(1): ITAT Special BenchWTO - Govt officials attend workshop on SPS control, Inspection & approval proceduresI-T - Surplus generated by agriculturist on sale of his agri land is no basis to deny exemption u/s 2(14) and treat sale consideration as business income: HCSecond Year of GST - A year to amend mistakesCommittee set up to examine 'decriminalisation' of offences under Companies Act
Time for Mr Modi to pay political price by decontrolling fertilizer sector

DECEMBER 06, 2017

By TIOL Edit Team

PRIME MINISTER Narendra Modi has kindled a new hope among the policy-shackled sectors such as the fertilizer industry, which is also victim of GST anomalies.

The reason for positivity is Mr. Modi's resolve to pursue reforms notably prevention of corruption for better future of India.

At the recent Hindustan Times Leadership Summit, PM reportedly stated: "I might have to pay a political price for the path I have taken (against corruption), but I am ready for it".

He added: "Our government has a holistic approach. We don't work in silos, and we work together ...".

If NDA Government takes a holistic approach, it would realize it is impossible to attain the goal of doubling farmers' income in five years without requisite reforms in agri-inputs arena especially in seeds, fertilizers and pesticides sectors.

And the backlog of reforms in huge and challenging in each of these segments. Notwithstanding political inertia on agri-inputs industries, fertilizers industry has tried to tag its reforms agenda with political agenda of doubling growers' income.

The Fertiliser Association of India (FAI) is thus holding its three-day annual conference with the theme 'Fertilizers and Farml income' to once gain plead for freedom from price and marketing controls, which it considers as a key to serving farmers with innovative agri-solutions.

Says FAI: "The fertilizer industry can directly contribute in achieving the Government's goal of doubling farmers' income by 2022. It is well acknowledged that fertilizers contribute 50% in the increase in food grain production / productivity".

To realize this, FAI wants industry wants 1) restructuring of urea pricing-cum-subsidy policy to check industry's losses; 2) bringing urea under nutrient-based subsidy (NBS) to promote balanced use of nutrients and thus increasing farm productivity and 3) removing GST annomalies such as 18% tariff on inputs ammonia, phosphoric acid, etc. as against 5% on fertilizers (finished products). The industry also wants the Government to extend GST to natural gas, which is the key input for manufacture of urea, the over-subsidized and the most over-used fertilizer.

The statutory retail price for urea has been increased modestly only twice in last 15 years, the 2 nd hike (10%) was made during April 2010. The Government has admitted time and again the delterious impact of subsidy bias for urea. The adverse impact include: imbalanced application of fertilizers, sub-optimal impact of such usage on crop yields and rise in fertilizer subsidy.

"The industry needs to be decontrolled so as to unleash its full potential,"over the medium term," pleads FAI. It wants the Government to pay fertilizer subsidy directly to farmers and not use the industry as subsidy channel.

Can Modi break away from the playsafe path (read controls) chosen by Nehru Government and treaded by all successive regimes.

Successive regimes have exhibited lack of political will to undertake holistic fertilizer reform recommended by upteenth number of committees and commissions. Fertilizer industry is the only sector that has been kept tied to multiple controls especially price controls since the Independence!

It is here pertinent to cite one case from the archives. The Report of the Tariff Commission on the fair prices of superphosphate for the period from 1st January to 15th August 1952 was presented to Parliament during February 1953.

If the Government of day can't live without price controls, then the price computation and its implementation should be transparent & reasonably profitable to the controlled sector. A 12-15% return on net worth is acceptable to many industries, for want of any other alternative. FAI claims urea industry earned a negative return of -0.7% in 2016-17.

The problem with fertilizer price controls is that they are arbitrary and defy logic. There is no reason why one product should be out of control and one not. There is no reason why urea should be under statutory price control and NBS fertilizers under non-statutory/deemed controls. Lastly, there is no rationale for using delayed payment of subsidy as a regular tool for management of fiscal deficit.

The subsidy arrears of Rs 43,356 crore in 2015-16 are projected to decline to Rs 30,000 crore in 2017-18. Delayed payments mean increase in working capital and rise interest burden, which is estated at Rs 3000 crore for 2017-18. This interest burden is not factor in computation of cost of production of urea. Fixed costs in such cost calculation have been kept unchanged since 2002-03.

Instead of resolving these issues through major initiatives such as urea price hike, the Government has chosen dubious method of containing fertilizer subsidy. It has decided to reduce the size of urea bag by five kg to 45 kg. The rationale for this is that full-scale introduction of neem-coated urea has led to nitrogen use efficiency. The Government concluded that this calls for reduction in bag size as farmers assess urea requirement in terms of bags. The fact is that universities recommend all fertilizer requirements in terms of kg/hectare or acre.

Such tinkering a bit here and a bit there shows reluctance on the part of Modi Government to sacrifice populism for real benefit of farmers and agriculture. It must have the courage to explain the nation the logic for bringing urea under NBS as win-win option for farmers, exchequer and the consumer.

Similarly, it must resolve all pending issues in seeds and pesticides sectors. The new legislation for both of them is pending for many years.


TIOL Tube Latest

GST 1st Anniversary - A Hardlook (Episode 2) | simply inTAXicating

What's New

CGST Notification
CGST Rate Notification
CGST Circular
Income Tax Notification
Income Tax Circular
Customs Tariff Notification
Customs NT Notification
Customs Circular
Anti Dumping Notification
DGFT Notification
DGFT Public Notice
DGFT Circular
RBI Circular