News Update

GST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
CX – Merely because assessees name is not appearing on certificate will not debar them from benefit of exemption notification 3/2004-CX: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 14, 2017: THE appellant cleared goodsviz. KM ELECTROMAGNETIC FLOWMETER HEAD MODEL IFS 4000 SIZE DN 600, LINER PTFE, ELECT SS31316LFLG CONN, SS304 etc. under exemption notification no. 3/2004-CE to M/s. Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd, New Delhi on the basis of a certificate issued by District Magistrate and Collector Sambalpur.

A SCN was issued alleging that the certificate was not issued in favour of appellant and it also did not contains details of goods, therefore, the exemption is inadmissible.

The original authority denied the exemption and confirmed the demand and so did the Commissioner(Appeals). However, the lower appellate authority reduced the penalty.

The appellant is before the CESTAT and submits that even though the name of the appellant is not appearing in the certificate nonetheless the goods were meant for the said project. Reference is made to various documents such as purchase order issued by the project authority M/s. Hindalco Industries Ltd to the buyer of the goods M/s. Gannon Dunkerley& Co. and also the invoices issued by the appellant to M/s. Gannon Dunkerley& Co wherein description of the goods is matching with the purchase order issued. Reliance is placed on the decision in Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd - 2013-TIOL-562-HC-MAD-CX, 2013-TIOL-562-HC-MAD-CX to justify their claim for the benefit of exemption.

The AR emphasized that unless the certificate is issued in favour of the appellant they cannot supply the goods under exemption Notification No. 3/04 is which the prime condition in the notification.

The Bench extracted the impugned notification and observed –

++ Notification provides that goods which are supplied should be covered under the certificate. In the present case though the name of the appellant is not appearing in the certificate but goods supplied by the appellant is clearly appearing in the purchase order issued by M/s. Hindalco to M/s. Gannon Dunkerley & Co . The said purchase orders reference is appearing in the certificate issued by the collector/district magistrate of Sambalpur district. The same goods were supplied by the appellant to M/s. Gannon Dunkerley & Co in turn M/s. Gannon Dunkerley& Co supplied the same goods to M/s. Hindalco. On perusal of the documents, we are satisfied that link between goods and the appellant and the goods meant for project is established, therefore, in our view appellant is entitled for the exemption notification No. 3/2004.

++ In the present case also there is no dispute that goods supplied was meant for the project covered under Exemption No. 3/04, therefore, significance was given on the goods and the project, therefore, merely because the assessees name is not appearing on the certificate will not debar from the benefit of exemption notification.

Holding that in view of the decisions cited, the appellant is entitled for the benefit of exemption notification no. 3/04-CE, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.

(See 2017-TIOL-4400-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.