News Update

World Energy Congress 2024: IREDA CMD highlights need for Innovative Financing SolutionsVoter turnout surpasses 50% by 4 PM in Phase 2 pollsST - Amendment made to FA, 1994 on 14.05.2015 making service tax applicable retrospectively on chit-fund business is only prospective - Refund payable of tax paid between 01.07.2012 to 13.05.2015: HCXI tells Blinken - China, US ought to be partners, not rivalsST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Amnesty Scheme, being of the nature of an exemption from the requirement to pay the actual tax due to the government, have to be considered strictly in favour of the revenue: HCCX - Issue involved is valuation of goods u/r 10A of CE Valuation Rules, 2000 - Appeal lies before Supreme Court: HCCus - Smuggling - A person carrying any article on his belonging would be presumed to be aware of the contents of the articles being carried by him: HCCus - Penalty that could be imposed for smuggling 3.2 kg of gold was Rs.88.40 lakhs, being the value of gold, but what is imposed is Rs.10 lakhs - Penalty not at all disproportionate: HCCus - Keeping in mind the balance of convenience and irreparable injury which may be caused to Revenue, importer to continue indemnity bond of 115 crore and possession of confiscated diamonds to remain with department: HCCus - OIA was passed in October 2022 remanding the matter to adjudicating authority but matter not yet disposed of - Six weeks' time granted to dispose proceedings: HCI-T - High Court need not intervene in matter involving factual issues; petitioner may utilise option of appeal: HCChina asks Blinken to select between cooperation or confrontationI-T - Unexplained cash credit - additions u/s 68 unsustainable where based on conjecture & surmise alone: ITATHonda to set up USD 11 bn EV plant in CanadaImran Khan banned from flaying State InstitutionsI-T - Income from sale of flats cannot be computed in assessee's hands, where legal possession of flats had not been handed over to buyers in that particular AY: ITATPro-Palestine demonstration spreads across US universities; 100 arrestedI-T - Investment activities in venture capital which are not covered in negative list under Schedule III to SEBI Regulations, qualifies for deduction u/s 10(23FB): ITATNATO asks China to stop backing Russia if keen to forge close ties with WestNY top court quashes conviction of Harvey Weinstein in rape case
 
GST to tax NOT ready-to-move-in but only under-construction property

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, DEC 14, 2017: The CBEC today clarified the applicable rate of GST on under-construction as well as ready-to-move-in property. What will attract GST is the construction of a complex, building, civil structure or part thereof, intended for sale to a buyer, either wholly or in part, except where the entire consideration was received after issuance of completion certificate, where required, by the competent authority or after its first occupation, whichever was earlier.

The CBEC clarification states that the sale of ready-to-move-in or completed property would not attract levy of GST. Hence, GST will be levied only on under-construction property.

Firstly, w.r.t. property on which completion certificate had been issued, the clarification states that no GST would be levied on ready-to-move-in or completed property, as per the Paragraph 5(b) of the Third Schedule to the CGST Act, 2017. Secondly, w.r.t. under-construction property, the clarification envisages two circumstances -

i) where the entire amount of consideration for the property was paid to the builder of such property before July 01, 2017, no GST would be leviable. This would be even though the construction was completed after July 01, 2017. However, such transaction would attract Service Tax @ 4.5%, considering that as per the Service Tax (Point of Taxation Rules), 2011 where the invoice was raised or payment was made prior to the appointed date under GST, the point of taxation would arise before the appointed day. Thus, such transaction would attract levy of service tax and not GST;

ii) where part amount of the consideration for the property was paid to the builder of such property, before July 01, 2017, Service Tax @ 4.5% would be leviable on the invoices raised or on consideration paid before July 01, 2017. However, any payment made by the property buyer to the builder on or after July 01, 2017 against invoices issued on or after July 01, 2017 would attract GST @ 12%.

Lastly, the clarification also makes it clear that in case of purchase of under-construction residential or commercial property, from a builder, involving transfer of interest in land or individual share of land to the buyer, the effective rate of GST for such purchase would be 12%, with full Input Tax Credit. It is also clarified that GST would be levied @18% on 2/3rd of the amount of the property, whereas 1/3rd of the amount was deemed to be value of land or undivided share of land supplied to the buyer. It is further clarified that consideration amount which did not constitute transfer in land or undivided share of land as part of the consideration, for instance, construction services provided by a sub-contractor to a builder, would attract levy of GST @ 18%, with full Input Tax Credit.


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.