Budget 2024 Updates

Rs 1.72 lakh crore allocated for capital acquisition for defenceI-T- Re-assessment - additions quashed as assessee given fresh opportunity to adduce evidence; nevertheless, assessee failed to participate in hearing despite multiple notices - costs of Rs 40000/- imposed on assessee: HCVaishnaw hails Rs 2.62 lakh crore capex for RailwaysCX - Final product is copper cathodes and not sulphuric acid, which is a by-product - Oxygen gas captively consumed in manufacture of sulphuric acid is entitled to exemption in terms of notification 67/95-CE: HCElectric Mobility Promotion Scheme, 2024 notified to promote green mobilityGST - Same input and output supplies though attracting different tax rates at different points of time - Since para 3.2 of Circular 135 has been struck down as ultra vires, refund to be extended: HCBIS sanctions 82 projects to faculty members of various prominent institutionsGST - Demand confirmed since petitioner failed to file a reply - Petitioner can be given one opportunity to explain subject to they depositing 25% of disputed tax from its Electronic Cash register: HCBihar passes bill to curb paper leaks with Rs one crore fine & 10-yr jailGST - Petitioner's assertion that the ITC available in GSTR-2A exceeds that availed of in GSTR-3B was not considered - Matter remanded; bank attachment lifted: HC380-feet asteroid to fly past earth at 29K Kmph tomorrow: NASAGST - Legitimate trade and commerce by every supplier should be allowed to be carried on subject to payment of tax and statutory compliance - Registration to be revived: HCPax plane crashes with 23 onboard at Kathmandu airport; 18 killedGST - Petitioner unaware of SCNs and the orders passed - Subject to petitioner depositing 25% of disputed tax, matter remanded: HCINDIA bloc boycotts Parliament; says Budget is discriminatoryTaxonomy is not about taxesBudget for Vikasit BharatI-T- Re-assessment invalidated where AO fails to record reasons for re-opening assessment & omits to apply mind before issing notice: ITATWill the Old Tax Regime be Consigned to A Margadarshak Role?I-T - Merely because there were rates differential amongst purchases from different vendors, it cannot be sole reason to infer over-invoicing / inflation of purchases: ITATJuly 21 (Sunday) was hottest day on earth since Ice Age: ScientistsGSTAT to deal with Anti-Profiteering casesRajasthan gets new industrial park in Union BudgetDepartment of Posts releases beta version of DIGIPIN for public commentsGovt issues Guidelines for 'Incentives to DISCOMs'Republicans at pain as Harris takes over Biden’s campaign fundsTN Chief Minister to boycott NITI Aayog Saturday meeting as TN gets nothing from Budget
 
ST - Omission of Entry 92C from Union List - SCN demanding Service Tax after enactment of CGST Act, 2017 is prima facie without jurisdiction: HC

By TIOL News Service

GUWAHATI, DEC 19, 2017: THIS Writ Petition has been filed challenging the SCN dated 23.10.2017 issued by the respondent Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Guwahati on the ground that after the enactment of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as well as the omission of Entry 92C from List-I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, the respondent does not have any jurisdiction to enter into an enquiry in respect of the subject matter of the notice and as such the impugned SCN was wholly without jurisdiction. It is prayed that an order be passed suspending further proceeding pursuant to the SCN dated 23.10.2017.

The Central Government counsel submitted that he be granted some time to obtain instructions in the matter.

The High Court observed –

"Having regard to the pleadings in the Writ Petition, this Court is of the prima facie opinion that the impugned notice dated 23.10.2017 is without jurisdiction. In view of the above, further proceeding under the impugned notice is hereby stayed until the returnable date."

The Court directed issue of notice of motion returnable on 05.02.2018.

In passing:

Entry 92C of the Union listwas omitted by the the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, w.e.f.  16.9.2016.

Before, it read as - "92C. Taxes on services."

The Law:

Incidentally, in our DDT column we had carried an interesting and exhaustive analysis on the subject "What is the constitutional authority for levy of Service Tax?" and by citing the Supreme Court decision in  2010-TIOL-87-SC-ST-LB   concluded - Service Tax is levied under the residual entry 97 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution and not under entry 92C, as strongly believed by many.

(See 2017-TIOL-2603-HC-GUW-ST)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: levy of Service tax

it is a fact that though entry 92C was entered in to seventh schedule but same was never notified and thus had no effect. in several case it has been held by apex court that service tax was levied under entry 97 and not under 92C.

Posted by Satya Narain
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.