News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
I-T - When depreciation amount eligible for deduction u/s 80IA is more than income, assessee is not entitled to deduct same on gross receipt: HC

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, DEC 29, 2017: THE issue is - Whether when the depreciation amount eligible for deduction u/s 80-IA is higher than the assessee's income, assessee is still entitled to deduct the same on gross receipt. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case

The Assessee-company, engaged in the business of consultancy and professional services for sale and installation of wind electricity generators. The Assessee had filed its return for the relevant AY. During the assessment proceeding, the ITO noted that the Assessee had entered into an agrrement with their principal company and manufacturer, namely, M/s Vestas Danish Wind Technology, A/s, Denmark. The power generated from the wind generators was sold to Tamil Nadu State Electricity Board and the Assessee had earned money out of the same. Further, the ITO noted that the Assessee had net profit from consultancy and was entitled to depreciation on the wind mills erected and commissioned. Accordingly, the said depreciation was reduced from income earned from generation of power and as the resultant figure was in negative therefore, the Assessee was not entitled to any deduction u/s 80-IA.

On Assessee's appeal, the CIT(A) held that the wind mills was used for more than one activity and, therefore, it does not follow that depreciation would be allowed only against income of one activity and not other. On further appeal, the Tribuhnal accepted the Revenue's contentions and held that the AO was justified in treating depreciation on wind turbines as a deduction from the income of power generation and therefore, there was no income from the eligible business on which deduction u/s 80-IA was to be allowed. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal was allowed and the order of the CIT(A) was reversed and restored the AO's order.

On appeal, the High Court held that,

++ the depreciation, which was to be allowed and given on the wind mills was almost fifteen times the income earned by the Assessee from generation of electricity, which was eligible for deduction u/s 80-IA. The Assessee would not be entitled to deduction on the gross receipt without reducing depreciation u/s 80-IA regardless of whatever interpretation they want to place on the provisions of Section 80IA. The view we have taken is in consonance and in conformity with the view expressed by this Court Dabur India Ltd., where it was held that deduction u/s 80-IA is on the net amount earned by the eligible undertaking, i.e., after computing the income of the eligible undertaking in terms of Chapter IV of the Act, which includes Section 32 relating to depreciation;

++ the question of bifurcation of depreciation in view of the two lines of business, etc. wanes, as the amount of depreciation, even on bifurcation, which would be reduced from the gross receipts of the undertaking eligible for deduction u/s 80IA, would be significantly higher. Therefore, we do not find any good ground or reason to interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal.

(See 2017-TIOL-2657-HC-DEL-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.