News Update

First course on Sustainable Urban Planning launchedScience & technology to be harnessed for preservation of environment: Dr Harsh VardhanMilk production registers 20% growthSteel Industry seeks removal of Customs duty on raw materialsFake encounter - SC asks SIT to wrap up probe in 12 FIRs by Feb-endHaryana also bans release of ‘Padmavat’I-T - When doings of assessee are not found to be not above board, it does not deserve invocation of extraordinary jurisdiction of HC under Art 226: HCPublic art should be part of urban planning: PuriGSTN technical glitches to be reviewed by Sushil Modi-headed Committee tomorrowCX - Without canteen, factory would not be allowed to operate under Factories Act, 1948 - Outdoor catering services, not primarily for personal use or consumption of employee, is covered under definition of Input service: CESTATCENVAT - Services of merger has no relation with manufacture - Even if order goes beyond the SCN, same is not an error of a kind which can be rectified by a ROM application: CESTATSettle disputes of earlier regimeIndia-Israel talk - PM lists GST & transparent tax system as one of his Govt’s achievements; promises more reformsExports continue to grow; log 12.3% growth in Dec, 2017IT Minister launches gigabit link between India and LankaCustoms - CBEC classifies Antenna used at BTS under CTH 8517 62 90Nepal, B'desh, Bhutan & India about to close pax protocolDec, 2017 records 11.76 lakh foreign tourist arrivalsFATCA - CBDT issues fresh direction on US TIN for pre-existing accounts (See 'TII Brief')GSTIN, UIN/PAN suffices for KYC verification - Board simplifies normsTelecommunication Antenna used at Base Transceiver station/NodeB/eNodeB in a wireless telecommunication network is correctly classifiable under CTH 8517 6290I-T - A financial transaction within the family members is not covered by provisions of Sec 269SS: ITATe-Way Bill pilot to commence tomorrow; States to notify it for Intra-State before JuneST - Rule 6(3) of CCR, 2004 - Writing off of loans as non-performing assets, whether exempted service - Matter remanded: CESTATI-T - Benefit of exemption u/s 54F is not limited to investments made on claimants' name only: HC
 
Govt sets up 24 Benami Prohibition Units; steps up drive

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JAN 11, 2018: THE Income Tax Department has stepped up actions under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, which came into force w.e.f 1st November, 2016. The Act provides for provisional attachment and subsequent confiscation of benami properties, whether movable or immovable. It also allows for prosecution of the beneficial owner, the benamidar and the abettor to benami transactions, which may result in rigorous imprisonment up to 7 years and fine upto 25% of fair market value of the property.

The Department had set up 24 dedicated Benami Prohibition Units (BPUs) under its Investigation Directorates all over India in May, 2017 to ensure swift action in respect of Benami properties.

Due to intensive efforts undertaken by the Department, provisional attachment has been made in more than 900 cases of properties under the Act. These include plots of land, flats, shops, jewellery, vehicles, deposits in bank accounts, fixed deposits etc. The value of properties under attachment is more than Rs. 3500 crore including immovable properties of more than Rs. 2900 crore .

In five cases, the provisional attachments of Benami properties, amounting to more than Rs. 150 crore have been confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority . In one such case, it was established that a real estate company had acquired about 50 acres of land, valued at more than Rs.110 crore, using the names of certain persons of no means as benamidars . This was corroborated from the sellers of the land as well as the brokers involved. In another case, post demonetization, two assessees were found depositing demonetized currency into multiple bank accounts in the names of their employees, associates etc. to be ultimately remitted to their bank accounts. The total amount attempted to be remitted to the beneficial owners was about Rs. 39 crore. In yet another case, a cash amount of Rs. 1.11 crore was intercepted from a vehicle with a person who denied the ownership of this cash. Subsequently, no one claimed ownership of this cash and it was held to be benami property by the Adjudicating Authority.

The Department is committed to continue its concerted drive against black money and action against Benami transactions will continue to be intensified.


POST YOUR COMMENTS