News Update

Violence in Delhi - HM asks all parties to rise above party linesEESL completes a decade of helping India become energy efficientCBIC hikes tariff value for Gold5 SC judges catch H1N1 flu; Govt scrambles to take preventive stepsGST - Anti-Profiteering - Sanitary Napkins - Order of NAA stayed: HCCX - assessee is eligible to avail Cenvat Credit on group medical insurance policy taken for employees: CESTATCus - Where limitation period for converting drawback shipping bills into DFIA bills is not provided in Customs Act, same cannot be fixed through a Circular - time limit fixed by Circular is only procedural & lacks authority of statutory provision: CESTATST - Consideration is essential pre-requisite for rendering any service - no tax leviable if such element is missing & if business is conducted on principal-to-principal basis: CESTATCharges of concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars thereof, are not sustainable, if additional income declared by assessee in returns is accepted by AO: ITATDisallowance made u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D is not tenable if quantum of interest-free funds exceed that of investments made: ITATNo enduring benefit arises from raising finances to fund a specialised job - cost incurred thereto is not capital expenditure: ITATACC issues appointment order of 17 Joint Secretaries, including an IRS officerCBDT lists 20 most contended issues - Govt to move SC to club all pending cases and dispose them, says Revenue SecretaryComputing profits from life insurance business, when computed u/s 44 r/w I-T Rules, do not entail an embargo on conducting scrutiny assessment: HCST - RTO charges and extra charges related thereto does not fall under BSS: CESTATChange in accounting method, resulting in disallowance of indirect expenses incurred, is not tantamount to concealing particulars of income - no penalty imposable: HCCX - Statutory return not designed to capture the particular grade/specification of material required for manufacture - For manufacture of automobile axle, 6 mm size of H.R. coil required, however, credit taken on other than 6mm and is rightly denied: CESTATUn-utilised amount received as grant from Government, cannot ipso facto be treated as income of the recipient of such amount: HCCX - Data retrieved from computer hard drive cannot be relied upon as evidence where computer was used by multiple persons & if no certificate u/s 36B of CEA is furnished in its support: CESTATRe-opening of assessment is invalidated if based on material already on record during original assessment proceedings & is tantamount to change of opinion: ITATST - Circular dated 18.05.2017 clarifies that turnover/transaction charges are to be included in gross value when computing service tax liability - penalties imposed are upheld if assessee collects an amount representing service tax, but does not deposit same: CESTATOyo, MakeMyTrip invite CCI eyeballs; Probe orderedFATF puts Mauritius on Grey List, triggers panic among FDI carriersPradhan invites investments, Technology Transfer into Indian Steel SectorShooters can now keep more firearms and ammunitionGST - Anti-Profiteering - Petitions challenging constitutional validity of s.171 of the CGST Act r/w rule 126 of CGST Rules and pending before Bombay HC, P&H HC transferred to Delhi HC (where 20 petitions are pending on subject matter) in the interest of uniform and consistent view on law: SCVseV Scheme - CBDT fixes 100% of disputed tax demand cases as target for officersACC appoints Rohit Yadav, JS, Ministry of Steel, as new JS in PMOTrump praises people of India for upholding democratic values; 1.25 lakh people welcome him at Ahmedabad stadiumCoronaVirus - Death toll soars to about 2600 in China; No of infected cases goes up to 77KGST - An agenda for reforms - Part - 74 -Anti-profiteering - Complaint sans statutory basis
 
TDS default - A few nights in Tihar?

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JAN 20, 2018: TIS Hazari Court has ordered judicial custody of the Director of a Delhi based Real Estate and IT Solution Company for non-compliance in Income Tax TDS Default case. It was found during investigations that the company had deducted TDS but had not deposited in the Government account despite there being a statutory obligation by the Income Tax Act. This also led to harassment of many innocent persons whose TDS had been deducted but the TDS returns had not been filed by the Real Estate Company. It was found that during FY 2013-14, FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16, amounts of Rs. 45,68,990/-, Rs. 35,45,290/- and Rs. 33,36,970/- were deducted by the assessee company. The assessee company was found to be defaulting on filing of TDS return statements. 

Taking into account all defaults, show cause notices were served upon the Director to explain why sanction for prosecution should not be granted under section 278B read with 276B of Income Tax Act for not complying with the provisions of the law in respect of non -deposition of the Income Tax deducted at source. However, during the proceedings, the assessee asked for repeated adjournments, instead of giving reasonable explanations for the defaults during the proceedings. Hence, it was concluded that there is no justifiable reason for the delay in depositing the TDS. This clearly showed the non-serious behaviour of the assessee towards the provisions of deduction and depositions of tax at source. Therefore, TDS Wing in exercise of powers under Section 279(1) of Income Tax Act sanctioned the filing of criminal complaint against the company as well as the Director under Section 276B read with 278B, 278E and 279 of the Act for FY 2013-14, FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16 in 2017. 

Non-bailable warrant was issued against the Director in December 2017 for non-compliance with the case proceedings. The Non-bailable warrants returned to the court unexecuted with the report that accused is avoiding execution of the warrants. Hence, on 19 Jan 2018 accused was taken into custody and was remanded to judicial custody. The accused has been sent to Tihar Jail for the same.   

The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi, Mr. S. S. Rathore, stated that the Department is very serious about timely depositing of the TDS deducted by the employers. It is reiterated that the TDS is Government money which has to be deposited in Treasury on timely basis. Failure to deposit the tax deducted will lead to criminal prosecution with imprisonment from 3 months to 7 years. This year the Principal Chief Commissionerate - New Delhi has sanctioned prosecution in about 240 cases which clearly shows the strict attitude of Income Tax Department towards the defaulters.  The Principal Chief Commissioner - Income Tax - New Delhi has given a strong message to non-compliant tax payers that tax defaulters will find it difficult to escape from penalties and prosecutions from vigilant and proactive Income Tax Department and at the same time ensuring Best Taxpayer Friendly Services for the honest and compliant taxpayers.

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS