News Update

After US & UK India comes third in terms of 79 mn cyber attacks in 2023: StudyCore Sector loses steam in March; logs 5.2% growthTrump fined USD 9,000 for ignoring court’s gag orderNHPC to collaborate with Norwegian company for Floating Solar Energy TechnologyCT - Option of review cannot be utilised as a method of rehearing or appeal and there must be finality to a litigation: HCST - As agreement with foreign supplier was on C.I.F basis and it was foreign supplier who entered into an agreement with foreign shipping line for transportation of goods, hence appellant not being a service recipient was not liable to pay service tax on amount of ocean freight: CESTATOpenAI joins hands with FT to access content for training AI toolsCX - Entire chain, right from procurement of aluminium ingots from NALCO upto delivery of aluminium conductors, transaction was established and accepted by Settlement Commission, no scope for Adjudicating Authority to confirm demand of Cenvat credit: CESTATIndia’s oil import bill likely to come down to USD 100 bn in current fiscalCus - Warehousing - None of the provisions have been contravened or violated by appellants inasmuch as in respect of all B/Es, the activities were carried out with approval and necessary permission given by department as well as under supervision of Customs - goods not liable for confiscation/penalty: CESTAT7 Maoists including two women killed in police encounter in ChhattisgarhBaba Ramdev-promoted FMCG companies caught in a pickle over GST fraudsI-T- As per settled position in law, if let out property remains vacant during whole of relevant AY, then its ALV is to be taken as NIL: ITATUttarakhand Govt cancels manufacturing licence of 14 products of PatanjaliIMF okays USD 1.1 bn bail-out package for Pakistan3 police officers killed in shoot-out in CarolinaGaza protesters on Columbia Univ campus turn tin-eared to police warningsBus swings into gorge; 25 Peruvians killedI-T - Sale consideration received in cash in lieu of agreement of sale upon failure of deal, cannot be penalized u/s 271D: ITATBattle against cocaine cartel: 9 Colombian soldiers perish in copter crashI-T- Payment made by NSE to Core SGF is business expenditure allowed u/s 37(1): ITATICG, ATS Gujarat seize Indian fishing boat carrying 173 kg of narcotics9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in Chhattisgarh
 
I-T - Whether benefit of Sec 80P is available even to income derived from marketing of agri produce not grown by its Members - NO: Supreme Court

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JAN 22, 2018: THE issue is - Whether benefit of Sec 80P is available even to income derived from marketing of agricultural produce not grown by its members. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case

The assessee is a cooperative society. It derived its income from commission on sale of fertilisers and sugar on behalf of the Punjab Govt. It also dealt in agricultural produce. It also had income from house property, interest and dividends. In its return it claimed that income from purchase and sale of agricultural commodities was exempt under Section 81(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Authority did not allow the claim. However, in appeal, the Assistant Commissioner allowed the claim which was upheld by the Tribunal but has been reversed by the High Court in Reference.

On appeal, the Apex Court held that,

++ the provisions of Section 81(1)(c) of the Act was omitted by Finance Act (II) 1967 and was re-enacted as Section 80(P) which granted the exemption to the societies in respect of income earned from marketing of agricultural produce of its member. However, clause (iii) of sub-section 1 was substituted by Income Tax (2nd Amendment) Act, 1999 with effect from 1st April, 1968 by limiting the exemption only to the marketing of agricultural produce grown by its members. The validity of the said provision has been upheld by this Court in National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Limited and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. It is not in dispute that the assessee is deriving income from sale of wheat, gram, maize, bazra and potatoes which can be said to be agricultural produce. However, these agricultural produce are not grown by its members but the assessee is marketing the same which is not the produce of its members;

++ we are of the opinion that the HC had rightly held that the assessee was not entitled for exemption of income under Section 80-P(2)(a)(iii) of the Act in respect of marketing of wheat, gram, maize, bazra and potatoes which were not grown by its members.

(See 2018-TIOL-21-SC-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.