News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
I-T - Bank Account details cannot be a substitute for 'books of accounts' to be maintained for purpose of compliance u/s 44AA: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

JAIPUR, JAN 23, 2018: THE issue is - Whether 'bank account' can be a substitute for the 'books of accounts' to be maintained by the assessee, for purpose of compliance of Section 44AA. NO IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee, an individual, filed her return declaring income u/s 44AAD. Consequently, her case was selected for scrutiny, wherein the AO asked the assessee to produce books of accounts but the assessee could not produce the same as she had not maintained the same. The AO noted that assessee had made transactions of more than Rs. 4 Crores including the deposits in the bank accounts and outward transactions from the bank account on which the assessee earned commission but did not maintain the books of accounts. The assessment was thereafter completed on a total income of Rs. 5,58,410/- as against total income declared by assessee of Rs. 1,88,040/-. The AO also initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271A as well as 271B for failure of maintaining books of accounts and getting the accounts audited respectively.

ITAT held that,

++ there is no dispute that during the course of assessment proceedings, the AO noted that bank transactions including deposit in the bank and outward transaction are more than Rs. 4 Crores. The assessee then filed revised computation of income and admitted the turnover of more than Rs. 4 Crores which shows that the assessee is not falling in the exclusion of provisions of maintaining the books of accounts as per provisions of section 44AD. The Assessee has clearly violated the provisions of section 44AA when the turnover of the assessee is exceeding minimum limit provided under the said provisions. Though the total income of the assessee was assessed by the AO as per the transaction recorded in the bank account however, the bank account of assessee cannot be accepted or regarded as books of accounts and therefore, the bank account will not substitute the books of accounts to be maintained by the assessee. It is a clear case of non compliance of the provisions of section 44AA. Therefore, in the absence of bonafide explanation the penalty levied u/s 271A is justified.

(See 2018-TIOL-136-ITAT-JAIPUR)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.