News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
I-T - When shares were allotted by assessee against which share application money was received in preceeding year, any addition based on such credit balance is legally not sustainable: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, FEB 01, 2018: THE issue is - Whether when shares were allotted by assessee against which share application money was received in the preceeding year, any addition based on such credit balance is legally sustainable. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case

The Assessee-company, engaged in the business of providing solutions in the field of information technology, agriculture products and allied industries. The Assessee had filed its return declaring total income. In the course of the assessment proceeding, the AO noted that during FY 2012-13, no business activity was carried out by the Assessee. Further, the AO found that the Assessee had earned income from interest on fixed deposits only. The AO also observed that balance sheet of Assessee reflected share application money pending allotment to the tune of Rs.2,34,86,419/-. Later, the AO opined that the share application money was received by Assessee for more than 9 years back in cash. Accordingly, the AO invoked the provisions of section 41(1)(a) and treated the share application money as cessation of liability qua the Assessee. On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the addition made by the AO.

On appeal, the Tribunal held that,

++ it is seen that the authorities in their orders have observed that the Assessee has received share application money more than 9 years back. However, the authorities have failed to indicate as to from where they have come to such a finding. The company is a public limited company and its books of account are subject to audit. The receipt of share application money must be recorded by Assessee in its books, as and when received. Therefore, the observations of the authorities that the Assessee has received share application money 9 years ago is without any basis and factually incorrect. The Assessee has allotted shares to share applicants in FY 2013-14 and has furnished list of shareholders to whom shares have been allotted. It has also furnished a copy of statutory Return of Allotment filed with Registrar of Companies under the provisions of Companies Act. Further, a bare perusal of section 68 shows that provisions of section 68 are attracted where any sum is found credited in the books of an Assessee maintained for any "previous year" under consideration. Therefore, no addition can be made u/s 68 in the AY under appeal when the share application money has been received in FY 2009-10 and 2010-11.

(See 2018-TIOL-183-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.