News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
CX - CENVAT - Inclusion of cess in consideration for sale price of imported goods is commercially sound -describing such transaction as 'passing on of cess' is not contemplated in law: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, FEB 12, 2018: PROCEEDINGS were initiated against the appellant for recovery of Rs.2,03,406/- allegedly being the "cess which they passed on" to their customers who bought goods that were imported by them for trading.

It is alleged that, by inclusion of cess amount along with the description in the dealer invoices issued by them, the appellants had enabled their customers to avail CENVAT credit of this amount which they were not entitled to.

The original authority confirmed the recovery of the amount along with the interest thereon and also imposed penalty of like amount.

On the findings that invoices had not been produced by the appellant, that the assertion in the audit report and order-in-original was sufficient to establish that the cess had been passed on and that by payment of the amount in dispute during the pendency of proceedings their erroneous action was apparent, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the o-in-o.

The appellant is before the CESTAT and produces a few of the impugned invoices issued for sale of these imported goods and which bear the levies in separate detail including cess.

After considering the submissions made by both sides, the Member (Technical) observed -

++ No evidence is available on record that the customers of the appellant had availed of credit of cess on the basis of invoices issued by them.

++ It does not appear logical that the printing of the breakup of various levies suffered on the goods at the time of import is not permitted by law. Nor does it confer a license to the customer to avail of credit beyond that permitted in CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

++ Inclusion of the cess in the consideration for sale price of imported goods is commercially sound and it is not the place of the tax authorities to intervene in determining the composition of such consideration.

++ Law does not require the cess to be a charge on the profits of the appellant. It is also strange that this transaction has been described as ‘passing on of cess' and, compounding of such misdescription with penal consequences, is not contemplated in law.

Hoping that the above proceedings were an isolated episode, the impugned order was set aside.

The appeal was allowed by setting aside the order of the lower authorities with consequential relief.

(See 2018-TIOL-517-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.