News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
CX - Merely by adding excipient, medicine which has a character of basic drug does not get altered – benefit of notfn. 4/2006-CE cannot be denied: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, FEB 13, 2018: THIS is a Revenue appeal filed in the year 2009.

The fact of the case is that the respondents have claimed exemption notification no. 4/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006 vide Sr. No. 47 in respect of their final product namely Natural Micronised Progesterone under the name "Sugest".

The case of the department is that as per Sr. No. 47 of 4/2006-CE and List 3 of Sr. No. 58 in notification 21/2002-Cus, the product covered under exemption is "Natural Micronised Progesterone" tablet whereas the respondent's product consist of various ingredients namely Lactose N-Ex, Maize Starch, Sodium Starch Glycolate N-Ex, B- Cyclodextrin N-Ex, Aerosil (Colloidal Silicon Di-oxide) N-Ex, Carbomer940N-Ex, Sodium Bicarbonate, Methyl Paraben, Glycerine Iso-Propyl Alcohol, Magnesium Stearate N-Ex, Talc and Adipic Acid.

Therefore, since the product is not Natural Micronised Progesterone alone, the benefit of exemption notification is not available.

However, the Commissioner(A) disagreed with the said stand taken by the department and, therefore, Revenue is in appeal.

The AR reiterated the view taken by the department.

The Bench observed that as per the exemption entry the drug and medicine both are exempted.

Furthermore,

+ Drug contains only one ingredient i.e. basic drug whereas any medicine which is manufactured out of a drug invariably consists of other ingredients which is normally form of excipient.

+ Merely by adding the excipient, the medicine which has character of basic drug does not get altered. Therefore, only by adding excipient the exemption cannot be denied, in the facts of the present case.

+ From the packing of the product it can be seen that the product sold is Natural Micronised Progesterone. Therefore, even though it contains various other excipients, the medicine is clearly covered under Sr. No. 58 of the list 3 of notification 21/2002-Cus. Therefore, it is eligible for exemption notification No.4/2006-CE.

Upholding the order of the Commissioner(A), the Revenue appeal was rejected.

(See 2018-TIOL-532-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.