News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Project Import benefit for local supplies under GST? - An analysis

FEBRUARY 14, 2018

By Pranay Sahay, Sr. Associate & Arihant Tater, Associate, Khaitan & Co.

PROJECT Import Scheme (PIS) was introduced in 1986 to facilitate import of goods required for setting up or expansion of an industrial project. Under PIS, the imported goods are classified under a single entry i.e. Tariff heading 9801 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (CTA) and assessed at a flat rate of duty instead of merit based classification and assessment on an item by item basis. Thus, PIS facilitates easy assessment of industrial goods falling under different headings and reduces the risk of litigation due to classification disputes.

Prior to the advent of GST, Tariff Heading 9801 only existed in the CTA and the benefit of PIS was not available under erstwhile Central Excise or Sales tax legislation(s).

With the introduction of GST, the CBEC notified CGST Rates applicable on various goods vide Notification No. 1/ 2017 – Central tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017 (in short 'CGST rate notification'). The said notification adopted the scheme of classification as applicable under the CTA, including the Tariff Heading 9801. At this juncture, it would be relevant to refer to Sl. No 451 under Schedule III of the said CGST rate notification which reads:

451

9801

All items of machinery including prime movers, instruments, apparatus and appliances, control gear and transmission equipment, auxiliary equipment (including those required for research and development purposes, testing and quality control), as well as all components (whether finished or not) or raw materials for the manufacture of the aforesaid items and their components, required for the initial setting up of a unit, or the substantial expansion of an existing unit, of a specified: (1) industrial plant, (2) irrigation project, (3) power project, (4) mining project, (5) project for the exploration for oil or other minerals, and (6) such other projects as the Central Government may, having regard to the economic development of the country notify in the Official Gazette in this behalf; and spare parts, other raw materials (including semi-finished materials of consumable stores) not exceeding 10% of the value of the goods specified above, provided that such spare parts, raw materials or consumable stores are essential for the maintenance of the plant or project mentioned in (1) to (6) above

Further, the Explanation to the aforesaid Notification states, 'the interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 including the Section and Chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretation of this notification'.

From a plain reading of the entry in Sl. No 451, it may appear that the benefit of PIS would be available even for supplies under GST as Tariff Heading 9801 has been reproduced even under CGST rate notification. A view could well be formed by trade that the benefit of Project Import has been extended for local supplies as well.

The key advantages that are available to an importer under PIS are:

• All goods imported under the scheme are chargeable a flat rate of customs duty without going into the rigors of merit based classification.

• It facilitates easy estimation of duty liability and cost structure for the importer.

On bare reading of the aforesaid CGST rate notification, the industry may look to avail similar benefits even for local supplies under GST. In short, suppliers engaged in domestic or local supply of capital equipment, spare parts, etc. for setting up an industrial plant could take shelter of this entry and apply single rate of GST (i.e. at rate of 18%) without delving into the exercise of classifying goods and identifying GST rates on an item by item basis.

Before drawing conclusions, it should also be pointed out that the customs benefit under PIS is available to an importer only for specified projects and subject to fulfilment of conditions specified under the Project Import Regulations, 1986 which were notified by CBEC pursuant to the powers conferred under Section 157 of the Customs Act, 1962. The key conditions imposed by the Regulations are inter alia discussed below:

• The benefit is available only to specified projects sponsored by identified sponsoring authority.

• The import contract must be registered with the Customs authorities prior to import of goods into India.

• The importer is required furnish a Bank guarantee before the Customs authorities.

As discussed above, the benefit is available only for specified projects sponsored by sponsoring authority. Till date, no project(s) have been specified by the Government for extension of similar benefit under GST. Additionally, the benefit is only available on fulfilment of conditions listed in the Project Import Regulations framed under Customs Act. No regulations have been framed under the GST law for making available the benefit of Project Import to domestic transactions.

Further, the Explanation to the Notification provides that rules of interpretation, section and chapter notes under CTA would apply to interpretation of the CGST rate notification. It does not, in any way, mean that projects specified under Customs would be deemed to be included for GST purposes also. Chapter note (2) of Chapter 98 clearly states that Tariff Heading 9801 would only apply to goods imported in accordance with the project Import regulations. From plain reading of Para 4 of Regulation, it would be clear that the assessment under the said heading No. 98.01 shall be available only to those goods which are imported (whether in one or more than one consignment) against one or more specific contracts. Local supplies are not import, neither it can be equated with one.It would also not be out of place to state that this interpretation would however render the entry under Sl. No 451 otiose and appears to be a drafting misnomer.

It is expected that the Government would act promptly to plug this loophole to mitigate any unwarranted interpretation or misplaced reliance on this Notification, which could then bring the Department as well as the Court into action.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.