SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Anti Profiteering Application - An analysis

FEBRUARY 20, 2018

By Rishab J

THE common experience of the countries introducing GST is that they face a short-term inflation due to the business entities utilizing the opportunity to ensure increased profitability during the transition period. Therefore, one of the major steps undertaken by the governments is to regulate the profit, i.e. ensure that the companies do not undertake profiteering measures and take undue advantages of the higher credit availability or reduced tax rate.

Taking a leaf out of the experience from Australia and more recently Malaysia, India too has introduced provisions relating to Anti-Profiteering in the GST Law. The anti-profiteering authority set up by the government to ensure that the benefit is passed has already received 169 complaints (as reported recently by the pink papers) and is scrutinising the record of other firms.

Relevant Provisions

Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that any reduction in rate of tax on any supply of goods or services or the benefit of ITC shall be passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices.

In line with the aforementioned provisions, the Government has taken a step forward and introduced the Anti-Profiteering Application Form (APAF - 1), wherein a complaint can be registered against a business entity breaching the aforementioned provision.

In this article,an attempt is made to analyse Form APAF-1 in respect of all the fields in the applicationto bring to light the implicationswhich affect all the stakeholders involved. This application is required to be submitted manually to the Standing committee and screening committee for scrutiny with all the relevant documents.

Who can file?

1. Interested Party (Interested Party includes suppliers or recipients of goods or services)

2. Jurisdictional Commissioner

3. Any other person

Whether Single Application can be filed for multiple goods and services?

No. An applicant is required to file an individual application for each product/service. In case the applicant wants to report against multiple products, he shall be required to file multiple applications.

It is pertinent to note that the term used is single good or service, so the government is expected to issue clarification in case of mixed or composite supply, wherein there are 2 or more goods/service involved in a single supply.

We shall now proceed and analyse the contents of the application-

Serial No. in the Form

Field

Mandatory/ Non-mandatory

Inference/Comment & Suggestion

A1.

Name of the applicant

Mandatory Field

Even a person operating in the same line of business can initiate the complaint

A2

Category of the applicant

Mandatory Field

Interested Party/Commissioner/Any other person- Specific codes for each category is provided for mentioning the same in the application.

With an option available to “any other person” to file an application, the government has tried to ensure that the business entities do not form a supply chain cartel, wherein none of the person in the chain reduces the price but there is action initiated against the such business entities even on a complaint received from unrelated party.

A3

GST Registration number. i.e. GSTIN

Non Mandatory Field

With an option available to entities forming a part of the supply chain or persons involved in similar line of business. A specific column for mentioning their GSTIN is provided in the application.

A4 and A5

Address and Contact number

Mandatory field

These are the basic details of the applicant required to be submitted.

A6

E-mail ID

Non Mandatory field

The applicant has an option to submit his email address.

A7

ID proof of the applicant (Code)

Mandatory field

The applicant is required to provide the code of the ID proof. The codes prescribed are as follows

01. Aadhaar Card issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India

02. Voter ID

03. Permanent Account Number (PAN) card

04. Driving Licence

05. Passport

06. Ration card having photograph of the applicant

07. Any other proof of Identity (Specify)

B1

Name of the supplier

Mandatory field

The name of the supplier is required to be mentioned in the application.

B2

Category of the supplier (Code)

Mandatory field

The applicant is required to mention the code of the category of the supplier, the codes are as follows

01 Manufacturer

02 Service Provider

03 Trader

04 Others (Specify)

Therefore, with an option to file against any other person, not falling in the category of Manufacturer, Service provider, trader intends to expand the scope of the application.

B3 and B4

Address and GSTIN of the supplier

Mandatory field

The application of the anti-profiteering only intended to be filed against a person making GST supplies, the GSTIN and the address of the supplier is made mandatory.

B5, B6 and B7

Contact Number, E-mail ID and Website

Non-Mandatory field

This information shall be entered in the application, if they are available with the applicant.

C1

Description of the good/service

Mandatory field

The description of the goods or services as provided in the invoice or price list is required to be recorded.

C2

HSN/SAC

Non-Mandatory field

Though this being a non-mandatory field, the applicant can mention the same as it is recorded in the invoice.

C3 and C4

Actual Price charged per unit Pre-GST and Post GST

Mandatory field

The applicant shall record the price/unit charged before introduction of GST and post introduction after deducting any discount or rebate given by the supplier.

C5, C5a and C5b

If goods are covered under MRP provisions, if yes then MRP pre GST and post GST

Non-Mandatory field

For FMCG products and other like products bearing MRP, the applicant can specify that the products are covered under MRP provisions and also specify the pre and post GST MRP, if he possess knowledge about the same.

C6, C6a and C6b

Comparative per unit actual Price/Value of like goods/services charged by other supplier pre GST and post GST (Name and GSTIN of the other supplier)

Non-Mandatory field

For few supplies, the measure of profiteering practice can be determined by the change in price of similar good/service provided by other suppliers. Therefore, any such information available with the applicant can also be provided in the application.

D2a to D2f

Excise Duty, Service Tax, VAT, Luxury Tax and Others including cesses, as applicable charged on the good/service.

Non-Mandatory field

This information enables the computation the Total tax rate (effective rate) pre GST and Post GST.

But, the applicant may not possess the knowledge of the taxes not specifically mentioned in invoice or product, such as Excise Duty, Cess etc., therefore it is made non-mandatory field.

D3

Total tax per unit (pre GST)

Mandatory field

This is a sum of Excise Duty, Service Tax, VAT, Luxury Tax and Others including cesses, as applicable is required to be included in this field.

Though this field is made mandatory, the applicant may not possess the knowledge of the taxes not specifically mentioned in invoice or product, such as Excise Duty, Cess etc.

D4a to D4e

CGST, SGST/UTGST, IGST, Compensation cess, Other cess

Non Mandatory field

Post GST, the tax levied can be easily identified as it is a sum of CGST+SGST/UTGST or IGST with Cess, including compensation cess, if applicable.

However, the same is made non-mandatory field.

D5

Total tax per unit (post GST)

Mandatory field

This is a sum CGST, SGST/UTGST, IGST, Compensation cess, Other cess, as applicable. This information shall be available in the invoice of the supplier

D6

Post GST reduction in rate of tax/unit

Mandatory field

Difference between D3 and D5 is reduction in rate of tax rate/unit.

D7

Benefit of Input Tax Credit – Input Taxes/Duties Pre-GST per unit, credit of which was not available (out of the Taxes/Duties subsumed in GST) and Transitional Input Tax Credit, if any.

Non-Mandatory field

GST proposes to introduce seamless credit flow throughout the supply chain. Therefore, any benefit of excess eligibility of Input tax credit because of introduction of GST is required to be passed.

Since the benefit of the excessive ITC cannot be computed easily, the same is introduced as a non-mandatory field in the application.

D8

Difference between actual price charged per unit- Pre GST and Post GST.

Non-Mandatory field

This is a difference between Sl No. C4 and C3 of the application.

D9

Amount of benefit not passed and GST on the after adjusting difference between pre GST and post GST actual price/value

Non-Mandatory field

It is sum of Sl No. D6, D7 and D8 of the application.

D10

GST on the amount of benefit not passed.

Non-Mandatory field

It is equal to D9 multiplied by the rate of GST (Including cess, if any)

D11

Post GST price per unit/ value to be reduced by.

Non-Mandatory field

It is sum of Sl No. D9 and D10 of the application.

D11

Additional information.

Non-Mandatory field

The applicant can further submit any other information which may be available with him and which may enable to establish the profiteering practice of the supplier

A bare reading of the aforementioned mandatory and non-mandatory fields clearly indicate the intention of the government to extract the maximum information available with the complainant, but on hindsight, by making majority of the fields as non-mandatory, the Government has clearly indicated its intention to ensure that every person who possesses any suspicion of profiteering measure undertaken by the business entities shall furnish the same to the department for further scrutiny.

If the firms are found guilty of not reducing the prices of the goods/services, they shall be liable to punishment as prescribed under the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules.

Penalty for undertaking Profiteering measures

Rule 133(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017 provides that any person found guilty of undertaking profiteering measures and not satisfying the test laid under Section 171 of the CGST Act shall be subjected to the following punishments-

1. Reduction in prices.

2. Return of the amount charged in violation of the anti-profiteering measure to the recipient of such goods and services with interest, if applicable.

3. Imposition of penalty,

4. Cancellation of registration.

Way forward for the Industry

Therefore, it is expected that every business entity undertakes the cost-profit analysis of each product under the erstwhile regime and under GST regime and ensures that any benefit availed by it is passed on to the end consumer. Further, it is required to be noted that the application of the concept of Anti-profiteering should be applied with every change of rate of tax in the GST regime.

(The author is Associate, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Attorneys, Bangalore and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh

TOP NEWS


AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST