News Update

CBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silverFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerCentre receives Rs 18.5 lakh crore tax revenue upto Feb monthUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayExpert Committee on developing GIFT IFSC as 'Global Finance and Accounting Hub' submits report to IFSCAIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEADefence Production issues notification for re-organisation of DGQAThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCBDT substitutes Form in ITR-5EV Revolution: Lessons for India to learn from US and China!London court green-signals auction of luxury apartment of fugitive Nirav ModiGovt consults RBI; finalises borrowing plan for first half of FY 2024-25Gadkari says Farmers’ protest is politically-motivatedVP calls upon women entrepreneurs to be 'Vocal for Local'America offers USD 10 mn bounty for information on ‘Blackcat’ hackers after UnitedHealth gets hitI-T- The order of the ITSC can only be reopened in cases of fraud or misrepresentation: HC8 persons including Hezbollah militants killed in Israeli strike on LebanonMacron pillories EU-South Africa trade deal; calls it ‘really bad’ in BrazilThailand’s Lower House okays Bill to legitimise same-sex marriageYellen warns China against clean energy dumpingMilky Way’s central black hole - Twisted magnetic field observedCus - Assessee has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that goods in question imported under air way bills/bills of entry were in fact filed by him and hence the only natural corollary available to Revenue is confiscation of same: CESTATSmall investors help Trump Media’s valuation skyrocket to USD 13 billionJustice Ritu Raj Awasthi joins as Judicial member of Lokpal
 
I-T - When Revenue had accepted assessee as investor in previous year, it cannot change his status to trader merely because he made some profit on shares: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, FEB 21, 2018: THE issue is - Whether when the Revenue had accepted the assessee as an investor in the previous year, it can change his status to trader merely because he made some profit on shares. NO is the ruling.

Facts of the case

The Assessee is an individual who derives income from sale & purchase of shares. During the year under consideration, the assessee showed income from long term capital gains of Rs.3,95,24,398/- on sale of shares which was claimed as an exempt income u/s. 10(38). Similarly, the assessee had shown short term capital gains of Rs.10,45,90,433/- on sales of shares. Further, the assessee had shown loss of Rs. 7,38,18,591/- from the Future & Option (F&O) in trading of share. While filing his return, the assessee had set off the F&O loss from the income earned from short term capital gains on sale of shares. The AO during the course of assessment, observed that assessee had traded in shares in huge volumes and in some cases shares purchased in lots were not even held for one day, before being sold. The assessee was asked by the AO to explain as to why the income from trading in shares be not brought to tax as income from business, to which the assessee submitted that he was an investor in shares. However, on analysis of the period of holding, the AO observed that assessee had mainly dealt in the share of the company named Core Projects Ltd. and the magnitude of dealing in shares of Core Projects Limited clearly revealed that assessee was dealing in the said shares with complete knowledge and timing of the market and hence the assessee was treated by the AO as trader of shares. The AO therefore assessed the income of Rs. 7,02,69,2369/- which was brought to tax as income from business and profession.

On appeal, the Tribunal held that,

++ it is observed that assessee has dealt in the past in the securities wherein the Revenue has accepted income earned from sale and purchase of shares on delivery basis to be capital gains (losses) while income (loss) from F&O transactions was assessed as income under the head income from business or profession. It is settled law that principle of Res-judicata is not applicable to the income-tax proceedings while principles of consistency has to be followed. It is the claim of assessee that all the shares were duly de-mated and dealings were undertaken on delivery basis, wherein the assessee has taken physical delivery of shares in his demat account on purchase of shares while the assessee has given delivery of shares on the sale of shares. It is an undisputed position that on such shares, capital gains were offered for taxation. The Revenue is, however, aggrieved with large volumes of trade and short period of holding which propelled him to treat the said income as income under the head income from business or profession. The assessee has also offered income from F&O under head income from business or profession. The assessee is treating the shares taken on delivery basis as "Investments" in its books of accounts which are valued at cost while stocks/securities under F&O dealings were valued at cost or market value whichever is lower and are shown as stock-in-trade in its books of accounts. There is no bar on maintaining two portfolios of shares i.e. one for investment purposes and second for trading purposes. The assessee has not borrowed interest bearing money to invest in shares which were dealt on delivery basis and were treated as "Investment" in its books of accounts which is evident from the financial statements as no interest is debited with respect to such shares, however some credit is extended by creditors which also majorly constitute payable on F&O transaction wherein interest is found debited for the transactions in F&O segment. The period of holding in case of majority of shares on which short term capital gains has arisen is ranging from 4 months upwards and insignificant amount of capital gain /loss has arisen on sale of shares within one months of its acquisition;

++ on the perusal of the frequency of transactions which has led to earning of short term capital gains, it is to be seen that assessee has made investments in shares and it could not be categorised that the assessee is trader in shares even though majorly the assessee earned capital gains on one share namely Core Projects Limited and quantitatively large number of shares were purchased and sold. Every prudent person who make investments in share-market do so for earning money on its investment with commercial expediency in mind and if an opportunity exists for making money in a very volatile and complex market, every prudent person keeping in view principles of commercial expediency will exit from the stock which yielded good returns and it cannot be expected of prudent investor governed by the principles of commercial expediency to hold shares for a longer period in a volatile and complex stock market and then end up losing money on shares merely with the fear that Revenue will classify it as trader if he end up selling at shorter period wherein he had the opportunity to make money. Merely because the investor has earned money on shares, it cannot be concluded that he is trader in shares. The Revenue has accepted in preceding years gains arising from the dealing in the share as capital gains wherein the assessee was held to be an investor and principle of consistency has to be followed. Thus, income earned by assessee from dealing in shares is to be assessed as income from capital gains.

(See 2018-TIOL-282-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023