News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
GST - GSTR-3B returns for period from Oct 2017 allowed to be filed with late fees first and once paid and proof submitted, amount will be auto-credited/refunded within one week by GSTN: HC

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 12, 2018: IN a scathing order dated 6th February 2018, the Bombay High Court had in the case of Abicor & Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd. (a manufacturer of robotic and automation equipment) - 2018-TIOL-05-HC-MUM-GST observed –

GST - Celebrations of new tax regime mean nothing - regime is not tax friendly - wake up and put in place the requisite mechanism - It is not the business of this Court to grant such access as is claimed by the petitioner - It is for the authorities to work out the necessary mechanism and set that in place - It must also set up and establish a grievance redressal mechanism – Matter posted: High Court [para 10, 12]

The matter was heard recently.

The petitioner's counsel stated that despite the Court's intervention on the earlier occasion and a joint meeting as envisaged in the order dated 24th February, 2018, being convened, there are still some outstanding matters/issues which require immediate and urgent attention of the authorities.

It is further submitted that the Goods and Service Tax Practitioners Association of Maharashtra had approved what are styled as “Minutes of the Meeting” dated 1st March, 2018, between the representatives of this association and the Central and State level Commissioners (GST).

The minutes were tendered before the Bench.

In response, the Additional Solicitor General raised an objection that these are not ‘agreed' Minutes, but they are drawn up by the association and they could be at best treated as a representation of the association.

The High Court observed that it had no doubt that the remaining grievances of the petitioners in this petition and the association would be redressed and, thereafter, the systems would operate strictly in terms of the Act and Rules.

Nonetheless, the High Court added -

“5. We record the statement made by the learned Additional Solicitor General, on instructions, that insofar as the grievances of returns without late fees, the petitioner may file their GSTR-3B returns with the late fees first. If that is paid and proof of such payment is produced, that will also be auto credited/ refunded in their cash ledger by the GSTN within a period of one week from the date the payment is made. We accept this statement as undertaking to this Court.

6. Equally, we expect the learned Additional Solicitor General, to appraise the Commissioner's of these grievances and, thereafter, ensure that they are followed up either with the council or with the appropriate Authority in the Ministry."

The matters were placed for hearing on 24th April, 2018.

(See 2018-TIOL-2762-HC-MUM-GST)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.