News Update

CBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silverFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerCentre receives Rs 18.5 lakh crore tax revenue upto Feb monthUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayExpert Committee on developing GIFT IFSC as 'Global Finance and Accounting Hub' submits report to IFSCAIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEADefence Production issues notification for re-organisation of DGQAThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCBDT substitutes Form in ITR-5EV Revolution: Lessons for India to learn from US and China!London court green-signals auction of luxury apartment of fugitive Nirav ModiGovt consults RBI; finalises borrowing plan for first half of FY 2024-25Gadkari says Farmers’ protest is politically-motivatedVP calls upon women entrepreneurs to be 'Vocal for Local'America offers USD 10 mn bounty for information on ‘Blackcat’ hackers after UnitedHealth gets hitI-T- The order of the ITSC can only be reopened in cases of fraud or misrepresentation: HC8 persons including Hezbollah militants killed in Israeli strike on LebanonMacron pillories EU-South Africa trade deal; calls it ‘really bad’ in BrazilThailand’s Lower House okays Bill to legitimise same-sex marriageYellen warns China against clean energy dumpingMilky Way’s central black hole - Twisted magnetic field observedCus - Assessee has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that goods in question imported under air way bills/bills of entry were in fact filed by him and hence the only natural corollary available to Revenue is confiscation of same: CESTATSmall investors help Trump Media’s valuation skyrocket to USD 13 billionJustice Ritu Raj Awasthi joins as Judicial member of Lokpal
 
ST - Supply of (DMF)/(TECHPACK) to customers - since assessee is manufacturer of excisable goods, they cannot be treated as provider of Scientific or Technical Consultancy service: CESTAT

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 19, 2018: THIS is a Revenue appeal.

The respondent assessee manufactures Bulk Drugs. During the scrutiny of the appellants' documents the Central Excise officers observed that the appellants had supplied the Drug Master File (DMF)/Technical Package (TECHPACK) to various customers.

It was the case of the Revenue that said activity is covered as ‘Scientific or Technical Consultancy' service under the Finance Act, 1994 and, accordingly SCN was issued demanding service tax of Rs.9,50,378/-; which was confirmed along with interest and penalty.

The Commissioner(Appeals) agreed with the submission of the assessee that they are manufacturers of excisable goods and not any Scientist or Technocrat or any science of technology institutes and hence they cannot be treated as provider of scientific or technical consultancy service.

Aggrieved with this order, Revenue is before the CESTAT and submits that the assessee has rendered the services of technical assistance relating to manufacture/testing of drugs to their customers who have paid money to obtain these DMF/TECHPACK; that the customers of the assessee have invested huge sums in purchase of the DMF/TECHPACK which is nothing but information/data relating to the manufacture of bulk drugs or pharmaceutical or any other products provided as per the customer's specification; that the impugned order should be set aside and the demand should be confirmed.

After considering the submissions, the Bench observed that there is no infirmity in the impugned order inasmuch as the Revenue had misinterpreted the statutory definition of ‘Scientific or Technical Consultancy' as provided u/s 65(92) of the FA, 1994.

The Bench further observed that - the activities of the assessee do not fall under the provisions of Service Tax. The assessee is a manufacturer of excisable goods and they are not Scientist or Technocrat or any science or technology institute. Therefore, the service rendered by them cannot be treated as provider of scientific or technical consultancy.

Noting that the Commissioner(A) had also rightly considered the decisions in Steel Cast Ltd. - 2009-TIOL-25-CESTAT-AHM & Administrative Staff College of India - 2008-TIOL-2007-CESTAT-BANG while dropping the order of the original authority, the impugned order was upheld and the Revenue appeal was dismissed.

(See 2018-TIOL-857-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023