News Update

India to wait for Canadian Police inputs on arrest of men accused of killing Sikh separatist: JaishankarLabour Party candidate Sadiq Khan wins record third term as London MayorArmy convoy ambushed in Poonch sectorDeadly floods evict 70K Brazilians out of homes; 57 killed so farGovt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha Elections7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implication
 
I-T - When assessee is State Govt Department engaged in development of rural India, it is not fair on part of Revenue to attach bank account for deposit of TDS in wrong manner: HC

 

By TIOL News Service

PATNA, APRIL 02, 2018: THE issue is - Whether when the assessee is a State Govt Department engaged in development of rural India, it is fair on part of Revenue to attach bank account for deposit of TDS in wrong manner. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee-department, engaged in constructing and maintaining the rural roads. The Assessee had filed its TDS return for the relevant AY. During the assessment proceeding, the Revenue noted that the Assessee had deposited the tax in a wrong TAN number, as a result, the computer system in which the deposit was made failed to reflect the deposit made by the Assessee. However, the Assessee submitted that due to certain administrative and technical defects, their deposit with the I-T Department was not properly reflected. The Revenue indicated that in view of the technical nature of working of the CPC System at Bengaluru, defects could not be cured and the Assessee was required to take certain actions in such matter. But, when no action was taken by the Assessee, the Revenue proceeded to attach the bank account of the Assessee.

the High Court held that,

++ the Revenue may be right in contending that the tax has been deposited in wrong manner because of which the deposit is not recorded and the correction is not possible and therefore, the Assessee should take certain action in the matter. Even if the Assessee did not take any action in the matter, the Revenue should not have attached the Assessee's bank account, instead should have taken up the issue before the higher authority of their department and tried to find out ways to resolve the same, instead of taking the extreme coercive action of attaching the bank account of the Assessee which has consequential effect of creating adverse effect in public functioning and managing the govt accounts, payment of salary to the employees and the public at large;

++ the manner in which both the Revenue and Assessee have functioned is not appreciable. Instead of approaching this Court, the Assessee should have taken up the issue through their departmental head with the I-T Department and thereafter tried to resolve the issue. The I-T Department also, in case it found that the Assessee has not deposited the tax in the correct form, should have taken up the issue with the Assessee's higher authorities or the State Government and tried to resolve the issue. Instead of doing so, the I-T Department took the most extreme coercive steps and the Assessee, therefore, approached this Court. In doing so, not only the public money, but public time and various other adverse effect has been caused;

++ this is a case where the Principal Chief Commissioner of the I-T Department and the Principal Secretary of the Assessee should be directed to sit and resolve the issue in question and till then the Assessee's bank account should be released.

(See 2018-TIOL-561-HC-PATNA-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.