News Update

CLAT 2024 exams to be held on Dec 1NCGG commences Programme for officials of TanzaniaGST - Appellate Authority has not noticed the provisions of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 which mandates that the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced, is also to be excluded: HCDefence Secretary commends BRO for playing major role in country's securityGST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that the reply filed was insufficient, he could have sought more clarification - Without providing any such opportunity, impugned order could not have been passed - Matter remanded: HCSC holds influencers, celebrities equally accountable for misleading adsGST - Notice requiring petitioner to furnish additional information/clarification does not mention that petitioner had to appear for personal hearing - Since no opportunity of personal hearing was given, order is unsustainable: HCIndian Naval ships arrive at Singapore; to head towards South China SeaGST - For the purposes of DNB and FNB courses, petitioner clearly falls within the scope of an educational institution imparting education to students enrolled with it as a part of a curriculum - Services exempted: HCIndia's MEDTECH industry holds immense potential: Dr Arunish ChawlaKejriwal’s judicial custody extended till May 20GST - Candidates appearing for the screening tests are not students of the petitioner - Petitioner's claim of exemption on such examination fees is unmerited: HCBrisk voting reported from all 96 LS seats; PM casts vote in AhmedabadGST - NEET examinations are in the nature of an entrance examination - Petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of an exemption by virtue of Serial No.66(aa) of the 2017 Notification, which came into effect on 25.01.2018: HCIndia calls back half of troops stationed at MaldivesIndia-Australia DTAA: Economic Statecraft through TaxRBI alerts against misuse of banking channels for facilitating illegal forex tradingTime Limit to file Appeal in GST Appellate TribunalEC censures Jagan Reddy & Chandrababu Naidu for MCC violationsFrance tells Xi Jinping EU needs protection from China’s cheap importsI-T- Addition cannot be made merely for reason that assessee got property transferred through registered sale without making payment to vendor: ITATI-T- Addition which is not based on the reasons for reopening is un-sustainable sans notice u/s 148 of the ACT: ITATOxygen valve malfunction delays launch of Boeing’s first crewed spacecraftFM administers Oath to Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as first President of GST TribunalGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in Haryana
 
GST - Recovery of food expenses from employees for canteen services provided by company is an 'outward supply', hence taxable: AAR

By TIOL News Service

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, APRIL 12, 2018: AN application for Advance Ruling was preferred on the point whether recovery of food expenses from employees for the canteen service provided by the applicant company comes under the definition of outward supplies and are taxable under Goods & Services Tax Act.

It is submitted by the applicant that the service provided to the employee is not being carried out as a business activity but as mandated under section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948.

The applicant also informs that the company does not make any profit while recovering the cost of the food items from the employees but only recovers the actual cost incurred.

Contending that this activity does not fall within the scope of 'supply' as the same is not in the course or furtherance of its business, the applicant submits that the same is not liable to GST. The applicant also refers to the Mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012-ST wherein services in relation to supply of food or beverages by a canteen maintained in a factory covered under the Factories Act, 1948 was exempted under the Service Tax Law.

The Authority noted that there is no similar exemption prevailing under the GST laws.

Adverting to the definition of "business" given in Section 2(17), clauses (a) and (b) of the CGST Act the Authority observed that upon a plain reading of the same, it could be safely concluded that the supply of food by the applicant to its employees would definitely come under clause (b) of Section 2(17) as a transaction incidental or ancillary to the main business.

It was further observed –

++ Even though there is no profit as claimed by the applicant on the supply of food to its employees, there is "supply" as provided in Section 7(1)(a) of the GST Act, 2017. The applicant would definitely come under the definition of "Supplier" as provided in sub-section (105) of Section 2 of the GST Act, 2017.

++ Since the applicant recovers the cost of food from its employees, there is consideration as defined in Section 2(31) of the GST Act, 2017.

The AAR, therefore, ruled -

+ Recovery of food expenses from the employees for the canteen services provided by company would come under the definition of 'outward supply' as defined in Section 2(83) of the Act, 2017, and therefore, taxable as a supply of service under GST.

(See 2018-TIOL-01-AAR-GST)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: What is the price applicable for canteen supply 'related peron'

As per the GST law Employer and Employee are falling under related person category, in such case does it require to consider the fair market price. It is not discussed in this order.

Posted by E Sairam
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.