News Update

CLAT 2024 exams to be held on Dec 1NCGG commences Programme for officials of TanzaniaGST - Appellate Authority has not noticed the provisions of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 which mandates that the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced, is also to be excluded: HCDefence Secretary commends BRO for playing major role in country's securityGST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that the reply filed was insufficient, he could have sought more clarification - Without providing any such opportunity, impugned order could not have been passed - Matter remanded: HCSC holds influencers, celebrities equally accountable for misleading adsGST - Notice requiring petitioner to furnish additional information/clarification does not mention that petitioner had to appear for personal hearing - Since no opportunity of personal hearing was given, order is unsustainable: HCIndian Naval ships arrive at Singapore; to head towards South China SeaGST - For the purposes of DNB and FNB courses, petitioner clearly falls within the scope of an educational institution imparting education to students enrolled with it as a part of a curriculum - Services exempted: HCIndia's MEDTECH industry holds immense potential: Dr Arunish ChawlaKejriwal’s judicial custody extended till May 20GST - Candidates appearing for the screening tests are not students of the petitioner - Petitioner's claim of exemption on such examination fees is unmerited: HCBrisk voting reported from all 96 LS seats; PM casts vote in AhmedabadGST - NEET examinations are in the nature of an entrance examination - Petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of an exemption by virtue of Serial No.66(aa) of the 2017 Notification, which came into effect on 25.01.2018: HCIndia calls back half of troops stationed at MaldivesIndia-Australia DTAA: Economic Statecraft through TaxRBI alerts against misuse of banking channels for facilitating illegal forex tradingTime Limit to file Appeal in GST Appellate TribunalEC censures Jagan Reddy & Chandrababu Naidu for MCC violationsFrance tells Xi Jinping EU needs protection from China’s cheap importsI-T- Addition cannot be made merely for reason that assessee got property transferred through registered sale without making payment to vendor: ITATI-T- Addition which is not based on the reasons for reopening is un-sustainable sans notice u/s 148 of the ACT: ITATOxygen valve malfunction delays launch of Boeing’s first crewed spacecraftFM administers Oath to Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as first President of GST TribunalGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in Haryana
 
VAT - Assessee's failure to object to pre-assessment notices, will not relinquish his right to personal hearing: HC

 

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, APRIL 14, 2018: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH IS - Whether failure to submit objection to the pre-assessment notices, by itself gives a right to the AO to deny opportunity of personal hearing. NO IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee is a manufacturer and trader of cotton yarn and waste cotton. Consequent to the completion of its assessment on the basis of the returns submitted by it, the premises of assessee was inspected by the Enforcement Wing officials, wherein certain incriminating materials were found, on basis of which the Officers arrived at a factual conclusion that assessee had not arrived at reversal of credit on ITC claim corresponding to exempted sale and sale on consignment basis. The Enforcement Wing officials therefore issued notice to the assessee to appear before them and show cause as to why the assessment should not be re-opened. In response, the assessee submitted its explanation, which was considered by Enforcement Wing and then forwarded to the ACCT for appropriate action in accordance with the provisions of the TNVAT Act. Consequent to the same, the ACCT issued pre-assessment notices. Since there was no response from the assessee thereafter, the ACCT completed the assessment ex parte.

High Court held that,

++ as far as ex parte assessment is concerned, the ACCT had initiated action for re-opening only on account of the report submitted by the Enforcement Wing. The Enforcement Wing forwarded the incriminating documents stated to have been seized from the premises of assessee along with the explanation given by assessee. Even though the ACCT considered the incriminating documents and the notices issued by the Enforcement Wing before issuing assessment notices, the fact remains that the explanation given by assessee on two occasions to the Enforcement Wing though available on file were overlooked by the AO. It is true that the assessee has not given any reply subsequent to the pre-assessment notices. However, that would not give a right to the ACCT to resort to the process of ex parte assessment in view of the explanation given by assessee to the Enforcement Wing, which is part of records. Therefore, the failure to consider the objections received by the Enforcement Wing and forwarded by them to the ACCT would vitiate the assessment orders;

++ as far as denial of personal hearing is concerned, the ACCT has denied the assessee opportunity of hearing only on the ground that objection was not given to the pre-assessment notices. Even if objection was not given, still the assessing authority was expected to post the matter for hearing by issuing notice to the assessee.

(See 2018-TIOL-688-HC-MAD-VAT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.