News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
VAT - Assessee's failure to object to pre-assessment notices, will not relinquish his right to personal hearing: HC

 

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, APRIL 14, 2018: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH IS - Whether failure to submit objection to the pre-assessment notices, by itself gives a right to the AO to deny opportunity of personal hearing. NO IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee is a manufacturer and trader of cotton yarn and waste cotton. Consequent to the completion of its assessment on the basis of the returns submitted by it, the premises of assessee was inspected by the Enforcement Wing officials, wherein certain incriminating materials were found, on basis of which the Officers arrived at a factual conclusion that assessee had not arrived at reversal of credit on ITC claim corresponding to exempted sale and sale on consignment basis. The Enforcement Wing officials therefore issued notice to the assessee to appear before them and show cause as to why the assessment should not be re-opened. In response, the assessee submitted its explanation, which was considered by Enforcement Wing and then forwarded to the ACCT for appropriate action in accordance with the provisions of the TNVAT Act. Consequent to the same, the ACCT issued pre-assessment notices. Since there was no response from the assessee thereafter, the ACCT completed the assessment ex parte.

High Court held that,

++ as far as ex parte assessment is concerned, the ACCT had initiated action for re-opening only on account of the report submitted by the Enforcement Wing. The Enforcement Wing forwarded the incriminating documents stated to have been seized from the premises of assessee along with the explanation given by assessee. Even though the ACCT considered the incriminating documents and the notices issued by the Enforcement Wing before issuing assessment notices, the fact remains that the explanation given by assessee on two occasions to the Enforcement Wing though available on file were overlooked by the AO. It is true that the assessee has not given any reply subsequent to the pre-assessment notices. However, that would not give a right to the ACCT to resort to the process of ex parte assessment in view of the explanation given by assessee to the Enforcement Wing, which is part of records. Therefore, the failure to consider the objections received by the Enforcement Wing and forwarded by them to the ACCT would vitiate the assessment orders;

++ as far as denial of personal hearing is concerned, the ACCT has denied the assessee opportunity of hearing only on the ground that objection was not given to the pre-assessment notices. Even if objection was not given, still the assessing authority was expected to post the matter for hearing by issuing notice to the assessee.

(See 2018-TIOL-688-HC-MAD-VAT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.