News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
I-T - Failure to explain scientific method in determining the amount of performance bonus payable to employees can lead to its disallowance : ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, APRIL 19, 2018: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IS - Whether in absence of any details regarding extra ordinary contribution in company by employee can performance linked bonus be disallowed. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case:

The assessee company designs, develops and markets energy management solutions for industrial applications. The assessee had filed return for relevant AY. During assessment AO disallowed the claim of assessee for Performance Bonus paid due to non furnishing of relevant details. On appeal CIT (A) observed that as per the policy / practice followed by the assessee company, performance bonus was assessed, reviewed and approved by the separate competent authority in HR dept. There was a scientific and systematic system to evaluate the performance and payment of performance bonus which was consistently being followed by the assessee and had been accepted by the department in its earlier assessments. Hence addition of Performance Bonus was deleted by CIT(A).

Tribunal held that,

++ admittedly neither AO made any reference regarding the addition in respect of performance bonus in the remand report, nor did assessee provide any order of any preceding AYs passed by any Appellate Authorities, wherein such bonus paid had been allowed. Assessee had not even explained what was the scientific method in determining the bonus payable to its employees for extraordinary performances. AR has not provided any details regarding the extra ordinary contribution by these employees in lieu of which such huge bonus has been paid amounting to Rs. 13.5 Lacs and 15 lakhs being Sh. Ashok Hattangady and Hema Hattangady respectively. Admittedly assessee in the remand proceedings has not submitted any details regarding the payments made to justify its claim. Thus no purpose would be served by setting aside this issue back to the file of AO. It was decided to confirm the addition made by AO in this regard and reverse the findings of CIT(A). Accordingly this ground raised by revenue stands allowed.

(See 2018-TIOL-585-ITAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.