News Update

Unveil One Nation; One Debt Code; One Compliance Rule for Centre & StatesChina moves WTO against US tax subsidies for EVs & renewable energyMore on non-doms - The UK Spring Budget 2024 (See TII Edit)Notorious history-sheeter Mukhtar Ansari succumbs to cardiac arrest in UP jailTraining Program for Cambodian civil servants commences at MussoorieNY imposes USD 15 congestion taxCBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silver45 killed as bus races into ravine in South AfricaCBIC directs all Customs offices to remain open on Saturday & SundayBankman-Fried jailed for 25 yrs in FTX scamI-T- Once the citizen deposits the tax upon coming to know of his liability, it cannot be said that he has deliberately or willfully evaded the depositing of tax and interest in terms of Section 234A can be waived: HCHouthis attack continues in Red Sea; US military shoots down 4 dronesI-T- Secured creditor has priority charge over secured asset, over claims of I-T Department & other Departments; any excess amount recovered by Secured Creditor from auction of secured asset, over & above the dues payable to it, are to be remitted to the Departments: HCFederal Govt hands out USD 60 mn to rebuild collapsed bridge in BaltimoreI-T - Receipts of sale of scrap being part & parcel of activity and being proximate thereto would also be within ambit of gains derived from industrial undertaking for purpose of computing deduction u/s 80-IB: HCCanadian School Boards sue social media titans for 4 bn Canadian dollar in damagesI-T - Once assssee on year of reversal has paid taxes on excess provision and similar feature appeared in earlier years and assesee had payments for liquidated damages on delay of deliverables, no adverse inference can be drawn: HCFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerST - Software development service & IT-enabled service provided by assessee was exempt from tax during relevant period, by virtue of CBEC's Notification & Circular; demands raised for such period not sustainable: CESTATUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayCus - Order rejecting exporter's request for conversion of Shipping Bills on grounds that the same has been made by exporter beyond period of three months from date of Let Export Order in terms of CBEC Circular No. 36/2010-Cus : CESTATIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEACus - No Cess is payable when Basic Customs Duty is found to be Nil: CESTATThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCX - As per settled law, a right acquired as result of a statutory provision, cannot be taken away retrospectively unless said statutory provision so provides or by necessary implication has such effect: CESTAT
 
I-T- TRO cannot suo moto assume powers under Indian Contract Act, 1872 to declare a transaction of sale to be void without approaching civil court: HC

 

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, APR 20, 2018: THE ISSUE AT HAND BEFORE THE BENCH IN THIS CASE IS whether the Tax Recovery Officer can summarily assume powers under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, to suo motu declare a transaction of sale to be void & without approaching a civil court. NO IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

During the relevant AYs, an individual was served demand notices u/s 156 of the Act, for defaulting in payment of tax. Subsequently, the property which was subject matter of the dispute, was purchased by certain entities. Subsequently, orders of attachment were issued for the property in question. Although these entities filed their objections to such attachment, the Tax Recovery Officer rejected them. Subsequently, the order of attachment was upheld and also declared the sale transaction to be null & void. Hence the purchaser-entities filed the present writs.

On hearing the matter, the High Court held that,

++ two facts are not in dispute. The vendor of the purchasers herein is a defaulter-assessee and that he alienated the subject properties only after receipt of notice under Rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act. Secondly, the orders of attachment were issued by the Respondent only after such purchase by the purchasers herein. There cannot be any doubt that a sale is a contractual transaction. For a contract to be valid, it must be made by the free consent of parties competent to contract. In this case, the property belonged to the defaulter-assessee. He had been served with notice under Rule 2. The moment such a notice was served on the defaulter-assessee, by virtue of Rule 16(1) of the second schedule, he became incompetent to deal with the property. In Rule 16(1), it is expressly stated that the defaulter assessee shall not be competent to deal with the property. If the vendor was not competent to deal with the property, he could not have passed any valid or legal title to the purchaser. Thus, the issue has to be approached through the prism of Section 11 of the Contract Act, 1872;

++ yet the orders challenged in these writ petitions cannot sustained as such. The Supreme Court in (1998) 6 SCC 658 has held that it is the function of the civil Court to declare a transaction to be null and void and that the Tax Recovery Officer cannot exercise the said function. Therefore, the Respondent clearly erred in declaring the transactions to which the petitioners are parties as null and void. Therefore, the orders challenged in these writ petitions stand quashed to that extent. It would certainly be open to the purchasers herein to avail the remedy set out in Rule 11(6) of the second schedule of the Income Tax Act. If the Respondent authority wants to have the transactions nullified, it is the Respondent who must go to the civil Court to seek declaration to that effect. If the purchasers want the attachment to be lifted, it is for them to move the civil Court and obtain relief as provided in Rule 11(6) of the second schedule of the Income Tax Act.

(See 2018-TIOL-747-HC-MAD-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023