News Update

For rains-ravaged Kerala 'relief' calls pour in; Customs explains proceduresMultiple personality Order - Implications and way forward!Customs Brokers and their woesST - Respondent cannot take shelter under a faulty software programme when they themselves handled system - Penalty u/s 78 of FA, 1994 wrongly set aside by CESTAT: High CourtBudget Allocation of Rs 2875 Cr - CBIC not happy with trend of spending less!I-T - Once trademark acquired is used for selling products, its eligibility for depreciation cannot be questioned, simply because trademark is not put to use for manufacturing activities: HCRecasting base year for GDP - Govt mulling over various alternativesFlood-battered Kerala - Cabinet Secretary-headed NCMC calls for shifting focus on supplies of food, water, medicines, power, fuel and telecom servicesIndia successfully test-fires 'Helina', copter-based anti-tank guided missile + also test-fires guided bombs smart anti-airfield weapon systemGovt yet to firm up mind for back-casting of GDP series; Various alternatives under considerationMulti-modal transport - TIR Convention comes into forceJalandhar CGST Commissionerate is first to become e-OfficeAadhaar Regulator to launch phased introduction of face recognition features from Sept 15Walmart wraps up Flipkart acquisition formalities; Current management to run operationsFormer UN Chief Kofi Annan passes away at 80DRI, Police & para-military forces seize 78 drums of ganja, heroin & tabletsKerala CM says worst flood in 100 years; PM announces Rs 500 Cr immediate reliefWorld Humanitarian Day - UN urges global leaders to protect people caught in conflictST - Tribunal has relied upon speech of Finance Minister for holding that assessee was not liable to pay tax without discussing relevant provisions of law/notifications - Matter remanded: HCAdvance Ruling - a nightmare for taxpayers?I-T - Exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv) can be claimed only to the extent of actual income and not for accumulated income: ITATSection 197 Certificate - CBDT proposes to amend Rules to make it electronicImport of Pet Coke allowed for only cement, lime kiln, calcium carbide and gasification Industries, when used as feed stock/manufacturing process on Actual User ConditionCBDT puts in abeyance controversial clauses relating to GAAR & GSTEvery 1% growth in mining industry soars up industrial production index by 1.5%, says FICCIRailways launches 'Digital Screens' at 22 Stations
 
Writing off inputs and reversal of transitional credit - IT systems play truant

 

MAY 15, 2018

By Anupama Ravindran, Adv.

ERSTWHILE Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 allowed for credit of Central Excise Duty/Service tax to be taken by a manufacturer or producer of final products or a provider of output services, credit of inputs, capital goods, and input services received by such person.

Rule 3 (5B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 states that if the inputs or capital goods are written off fully or partially on which Cenvat Credit was taken, an amount equivalent to the Cenvat credit taken in respect of said input or capital goods shall be paid back.

Similarly, in the GST Regime, Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 states that a registered person is entitled to credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services, or both, to him which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of his business. Section 17(5)(h) of the CGST Act provides that input tax credit shall not be available in respect of goods that are written off.

For the purposes of illustration, let us consider that a business has purchased inputs in the erstwhile Central Excise regime with the intention of using it in manufacturing finished products. The business would have taken Cenvat Credit on such inputs. Such Cenvat credit would have been transited as CGST Credit under Section 140(1) of the CGST Act.

During the GST Regime, consider that the business has decided to discontinue the product line for which the inputs has been purchased, and decided to "write off" the inputs. Under Section 17(5) (h) of the CGST Act, businesses are not eligible to take input tax credit on inputs that have been written off. Consequently, the business has decided to "reverse" the transited input tax credit.

The crux of the article is with regard to the nuances of reversal of Input tax credit on account of written off inputs. The article does not dwell on whether input tax credit is reversible at all under the said circumstances. Rule 42 of the CGST Rules provides for the "Manner of determination of Input Tax Credit in respect of inputs or input services and reversal thereof". Rule 42(1) of the CGST Rules refers to attributing input tax credit to inputs and input services which are used for business and personal purposes and partly for effecting exempt and taxable supplies. Here the method of computation has been provided for input tax credit availed during the relevant period. Since the credit being discussed herein is transited credit, the said Rule may not be relevant.

Table 11 of Form GSTR-2 has been provided to furnish information on "Input Tax Credit Reversal / Reclaim". The relevant line item in Table 11 of GSTR-2 is 11(A)(h) "Any other liability (Specify)", where it seems possible to furnish the details of transited input tax credit to be reversed.

I have a few observations here. Businesses have received Central Excise Duty Credit on the inputs as CGST Credit during transition. Now, when they have written off the transited inputs, they are attempting to reverse the CGST credit under line item "Any other liability (specify)". However,when we enter the amount in Central Tax column, the equal amount is also getting reflected under State/UT Tax column.Same is the story in Form GSTR-3B which is a monthly return. When we enter the CGST amount to be reversed under Table 4(B)(2) as "Others" ITC Reversed, the same amount is appearing in SGST column.

If the business, therefore, chooses to deposit half of the amount as CGST, so the equal amount gets remitted as SGST, is the business safe from a future litigation for CGST Dues.

Also, all other line items in Table 11 of GSTR-2 specify "Amount in terms of …", however the line item that is used for reversal in the instant case states "Any other liability". Businesses are interpreting the term to mean Amount to reverse. That is, the same amount that has transited as CGST is being reversed here.

The larger issue is that no mechanism has been indicated for computation or method for reversal of the transited input tax credit when such inputs are written off. Perhaps a rule stating that the relevant amount is to be reversed and under what heading, will help in avoiding litigations in future.

Just as an aside, are the IT systems going to constrain businesses into declaring what they do not intend to. In the instant case, IT system is making the business defaulter and makes the business end up paying interest on the ineligible ITC. Can the Government not think about providing auto-filled values, but leaving the fields editable, so the return truly reflects the self-assessments of the businesses?

(The author is associated with Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Bangalore and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Technical Glitches

The reversal of itc by showing it in GSTR-3B other reversals column was working fine till the GSTR-3B filing process on the portal was changed in mid of February,2018. Many Assessees reversed the credit before the change.
But, after the change the assessees could not reverse the itc of only one head i.e CGST or SGST as the system is not allowing. It is felt that this change in GSTR-3B is to be reverted back and it should enable the assessees to reverse the credit of any one tax head wherever required..

It is also learnt that few of the field functionaries have also reported the issue for necessary changes in the GSTR-3B filing process on the portal.

Posted by KARTHIK AITHA
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Legal Wrangle | GST | Episode 80

What's New

CGST Rule Notification
CGST Rate Notification
CGST Circular
IGST Rate Notification
UTGST Rate Notification
Cess Rate Notification
Income Tax Notification
Income Tax Circular
CBDT Order - IT Return  
Customs Tariff Notification
Customs NT Notification
Customs Circular
Anti Dumping Notification
Excise - Instruction  
Service Tax Circular
DGFT Notification
DGFT Public Notice
DGFT Circular
RBI Circular

TAXATION & WILDLIFE



wso shell wso shell Indoxploit Shell wso shell hacklink hacklink satışı hacklink deface mirror hacklink satış wso shell