News Update

World Energy Congress 2024: IREDA CMD highlights need for Innovative Financing SolutionsVoter turnout surpasses 50% by 4 PM in Phase 2 pollsST - Amendment made to FA, 1994 on 14.05.2015 making service tax applicable retrospectively on chit-fund business is only prospective - Refund payable of tax paid between 01.07.2012 to 13.05.2015: HCXI tells Blinken - China, US ought to be partners, not rivalsST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Amnesty Scheme, being of the nature of an exemption from the requirement to pay the actual tax due to the government, have to be considered strictly in favour of the revenue: HCCX - Issue involved is valuation of goods u/r 10A of CE Valuation Rules, 2000 - Appeal lies before Supreme Court: HCCus - Smuggling - A person carrying any article on his belonging would be presumed to be aware of the contents of the articles being carried by him: HCCus - Penalty that could be imposed for smuggling 3.2 kg of gold was Rs.88.40 lakhs, being the value of gold, but what is imposed is Rs.10 lakhs - Penalty not at all disproportionate: HCCus - Keeping in mind the balance of convenience and irreparable injury which may be caused to Revenue, importer to continue indemnity bond of 115 crore and possession of confiscated diamonds to remain with department: HCCus - OIA was passed in October 2022 remanding the matter to adjudicating authority but matter not yet disposed of - Six weeks' time granted to dispose proceedings: HCI-T - High Court need not intervene in matter involving factual issues; petitioner may utilise option of appeal: HCChina asks Blinken to select between cooperation or confrontationI-T - Unexplained cash credit - additions u/s 68 unsustainable where based on conjecture & surmise alone: ITATHonda to set up USD 11 bn EV plant in CanadaImran Khan banned from flaying State InstitutionsI-T - Income from sale of flats cannot be computed in assessee's hands, where legal possession of flats had not been handed over to buyers in that particular AY: ITATPro-Palestine demonstration spreads across US universities; 100 arrestedI-T - Investment activities in venture capital which are not covered in negative list under Schedule III to SEBI Regulations, qualifies for deduction u/s 10(23FB): ITATNATO asks China to stop backing Russia if keen to forge close ties with WestNY top court quashes conviction of Harvey Weinstein in rape case
 
Suspension of inter-state E-Way Bill on or after February 2, 2018 - a myth?

 

MAY 18, 2018

By Atul Gupta, Adv.

THE GST Council in its 24th Meeting held on 16th December, 2017 recommended implementation of Nationwide e-way bill system for inter-state movement of goods on compulsory basis w.e.f. 01.02.2018. It may be noted that CGST Rules initially comprised Rule 138, which empowered the Government (the Central Government as per section 2(53)) to specify the documents that the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods shall carry, while the goods are in movement or in transit storage. This authority was given to the Government till such time an e-way bill system is developed and approved by the GST Council. Subsequently, the Central Government issued the following Notifications upto 02.02.2018, which are relevant for present discussion:

a. Notification No. 27/2017-Central Tax dated 30.08.2017 proposed substitution of Rule 138 with a new Rule 138 from a future date [sub-para (2) and para 2].

b. Notification No. 74/2017-Central Tax dated 29.12.2017 gave effect to Notification No. 27/2017-Central Tax dated 30.08.2017 and the proposed new Rule 128 was notified to come into effect from 01.02.2018

c. Notification No. 3/2018-Central Tax dated 23.01.2018 which once again proposed substitution of Rule 138 w.e.f. 01.02.2018

d. Notification No. 11/2018-Central Tax dated 02.02.2018 which rescinded Notification No. 74/2017-Central Tax dated 29.12.2017

It appears from the above Notifications that the Government with effect from 01.02.2018 implemented two Rule(s) 138 [one by Notification No. 27/2017 read with Notification No. 74/2017 dated 29.12.2017 and another by Notification No. 3/2018 dated 23.01.2018 by substituting Rule 138]. However, as Notification No. 3/2018 dated 23.01.2018 was issued,when Notification No. 27/2017 read with Notification No. 74/2017 were still alive, therefore, it is axiomatic that Notification No. 3/2018 was only implemented. The legal effect of such substitution of Rule 138 was that Notification No. 27/2017 read with Notification No. 74/2017 never saw the light of the day.

Consequently, on 01.02.2018, Notification No. 3/2018 dated 23.01.2018 which substituted Rule 138 was in operation and the same made issuance of E way Bill mandatory.

However, the interesting part is that on 02.02.2018, the Government rescinded Notification No. 74/2017 dated 29.12.2017, which never came into force. Thus, the Notification No. 3/2018 dated 23.01.2018, which came into force from 01.02.2018 continued to be in force till it was substituted w.e.f. 01.04.2018 by new Rule 138 as envisaged by Notification No. 12/2018 dated 07.03.2018 made effective by Notification No. 15/2018 dated 23.03.2018.

It is also worth noting that the recommendations of the GST Council are mandatory in nature and as per the minutes of meeting publicly available, the GST Council never changed the date fixed as 01.02.2018 for implementation of e-way bill for nationwide inter-state supply.

From this examination, it seems it is only a myth created that the e-way bill system for Nationwide inter-state supply of goods was not in force up to 01.04.2018. Thus, the deferment of E way bill as advertised by the Government was not supported by any legal provision. Incidentally, it is not clear as to under which provision of the CGST Act did the Government defer the applicability of E-way bill from 01.02.2018 to 31.03.2018.

(The author is Joint Partner, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Allahabad and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.